Study on the Strengthening Effect of a Typical RC Frame in Wenchuan Earthquake with Attached Substructures

Article Preview

Abstract:

This work is based on a typical RC frame that was closed to the epicenter and collapsed during the Wenchuan Earthquake. The seismic collapse resistance of the frame was strengthened by attached substructures, including conventional brace, buckling restrained brace (BRB) and viscous damper. Collapse fragility analysis based on incremental dynamic analysis is implemented for each strengthening scheme to compare their effects and to analyze the influence of critical parameters. The results show that the viscous damper performs better than the BRB, and the BRB performs better than the conventional brace. With the same strengthening parameters, the A-shaped bracing scheme is better than the X-shaped scheme.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2057-2064

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Code for seismic design of buildings [S]. GB 50011-2001, Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2001. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[2] Analysis on Building Seismic Damage in Wenchuan Earthquake, Journal of Building Structures [J], 2008, 29(4): 1-9. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] Ye LP, Lu XZ, Li Y, Design objectives and collapse prevention for building structures in mega-earthquake, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2010, 9(2): 189-200.

DOI: 10.1007/s11803-010-0005-5

Google Scholar

[4] Tang BX, Lu XZ, Ye LP, Shi W, Evaluation of collapse resistance of RC frame structures for Chinese schools in seismic design categories B and C, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2011, 10(3): 369-377.

DOI: 10.1007/s11803-011-0073-1

Google Scholar

[5] Lu XZ, Ye LP, Ma YH, Tang DY, Lessons from the collapse of typical RC frames in Xuankou School during the great Wenchuan Earthquake, Advances in Structural Engineering, 2012, 15(1): 139-153.

DOI: 10.1260/1369-4332.15.1.139

Google Scholar

[6] Quantification of building seismic performance factors [S], ATC-63 Project Report (90% Draft), FEMA P695 / April (2008).

Google Scholar

[7] Lu XZ. Ye LP, Miao ZW. Elasto-plastic analysis of buildings against earthquake [M], Beijing: China Architecture and Building Press, 2009. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[8] Lu XZ, Ye LP, Ma YH, Tang DY, Lessons from the collapse of typical RC frames in Xuankou School during the great Wenchuan Earthquake, Advances in Structural Engineering, 2012, 15(1): 139-153.

DOI: 10.1260/1369-4332.15.1.139

Google Scholar

[9] B. Bousalem, N. Chikh. Development of a confined model for rectangular ordinary reinforced concrete columns [J]. Materials and Structures, 2007, 40: 605–613.

DOI: 10.1617/s11527-006-9172-2

Google Scholar

[10] Alexander M. Remennkov, Warren R. Walpole. Modeling the inelastic cyclic behaviour of a bracing member for work-hardening material [J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 1997, 34(27): 3491-3515.

DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7683(96)00212-0

Google Scholar

[11] Huang Shengnan, Lu Xinzheng, Ye Lieping. A hysteretic model of conventional steel braces and an analysis of the collapse prevention effect of brace strengthening [J]. Applied mechanics and materials, 2012, 174-177: 3-10.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.174-177.3

Google Scholar

[12] Ali Davaran, Narges Easazadeh Far. An inelastic model for low cycle fatigue prediction in steel braces [J]. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 2009, 65(3): 523-530.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.07.027

Google Scholar

[13] Jun Jin, Sherif El-Tawil. Inelastic cyclic model for steel braces [J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2003, 129(5): 548-557.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(2003)129:5(548)

Google Scholar