Effects of Backwashing on the Characteristics of Sand Filtration Effluents: Organic and Microbial Analyses

Abstract:

In this study, the head loss, turbidity, particle size, and zeta potential were monitored from the effluent of the sand filtration system after backwashing located in Cheng-Ching Lake (CCL) Water Treatment Plant. Moreover, the non-purgeable dissolved organic matter (NPDOC) and excitation emission fluorescent matrix (EEFM) were measured for the collected water samples with or without the pretreatment process. Results indicate that the turbidity of the influent dropped to 0.06 NTU and remained stable after flowing through the sand filter during the 4-hr operation period. However, a continuous increase of the head loss and sand particle size for the sand filter was observed. This phenomenon was opposite with the absolute value of zeta potential. The water samples were collected from the effluent of the sand filter and were treated by a 0.2 μm membrane filter. Thus, higher NPDOC values of sample without pretreatment were observed in comparison with sample with treatment. Results indicate that the sand filter was able to remove NPDOC, and bacteria might proliferate among the sand filter in rapid filtration. Results from the EEFM analyses show that effluents without membrane filtration pretreatment contained a higher percentage of aromatic protein. Compared to the water samples without pretreatment, more humic-like substance was found in the effluent. This reveals that microbial products or bacteria were detached from the fillers after the backwashing process.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 353-356)
• Pages: 2921-2925
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.353-356.2921
• Online since: August 2013
• Authors: Jian Li Lin, Chih Ming Kao, Jen Jeng Chen, Shao Wei Liao, Chung Yi Chung, Wen Liang Lai
• Keywords: Excitation Emission Fluorescent Matrix (EEFM), Rapid Filtration, Sand Filter, Water Treatment Plant

References

[1] N.J. McCormick, M. Porter, M.E. Walsh, Disinfection by-products in filter backwash water: implications to water quality in recycle designs, Water research, 44 (2010) 4581-4589.

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.05.042

[2] J.F. Colton, P. Hillis, C.S.B. Fitzpatrick, Filter backwash and start-up strategies for enhanced particulate removal, Wat. Res., 30 (1996) 2502-2507.

DOI: 10.1016/0043-1354(96)00085-1

[3] S. Determann, J.M. Lobbes, R. Reuter, J. Rullkötter, Ultraviolet fluorescence excitation and emission spectroscopy of marine algae and bacteria, Marine Chemistry, 62 (1998) 137-156.

DOI: 10.1016/s0304-4203(98)00026-7

[4] K. Mopper, C.A. Schultz, Fluorescence as a possible tool for studying the nature and water column distribution of DOC components, Marine Chemistry, 41 (1993) 229-238.

DOI: 10.1016/0304-4203(93)90124-7

[5] W. Chen, P. Westerhoff, J.A. Leenheer, K. Booksh, Fluorescence excitation - Emission matrix regional integration to quantify spectra for dissolved organic matter, Environmental science & technology, 37 (2003) 5701-5710.

DOI: 10.1021/es034354c

[6] Y.H. Chuang, G.S. Wang, H.H. Tung, Chlorine residuals and haloacetic acid reduction in rapid sand filtration, Chemosphere, 85 (2011) 1146-1153.

DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.08.037

[7] W.L. Lai, L.F. Chen, S.W. Liao, S.L. Hsu, L.H. Tseng, C.L. Miaw, Using EEFM (Excitation emission fluorescence matrix) to differentiate the organic properties of the effluents from the ozonated biofilters, Water Air and Soil Pollution, 186 (2007).

DOI: 10.1007/s11270-007-9461-6

[8] Y. Wang, F. Hammes, N. Boon, T. Egli, Quantification of the filterability of freshwater bacteria through 0. 45, 0. 22, and 0. 1 μm Pore size filters and shape-dependent enrichment of filterable bacterial communities, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41 (2007).

DOI: 10.1021/es0707198