The Calculation and Judgment of Critical Connections of the Outer-Shell Connections

Article Preview

Abstract:

Under seismic action, it is easy for the traditional steel nodes to produce a greater degree of brittle failure. The assembly of steel outer annual node after its manufacture in the factory reduces the shear deformation of the structure, and improves the rigidity of the node. The destruction of the structure occurs mainly in some critical parts. By making a calculation of critical connections in this article, we can make the structure more secure.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3211-3214

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Leon RT, Semi-rigid composite construction, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 1990, pp.1559-120.

Google Scholar

[2] Jarrett, N.D., Lennon, T., Composite subframe tests. Report no. 3: Results from test NR2. Report N141/92, Building Research Establishment, (1992).

Google Scholar

[3] Li, T. Q. Nethercot, D.A. and Choo, B.S., Behavior of flush end-plate composite connections with unbalanced moment and variable shear/moment ratios-I. Experimental behaviour, Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 1996, 38(2), pp.125-164.

DOI: 10.1016/0143-974x(96)00015-6

Google Scholar

[4] M. Dhanalnkshmi, M.P. Byfied and G.H. Couchman, Composite connections at perimeter locations in unpropped composite floors, Advances in Steel Structures, Vol. 1, (2002).

DOI: 10.1016/b978-008044017-0/50030-5

Google Scholar

[5] D. S. Sophianopoulos. The effect of joint flexibility on the free elastic vibration characteristics of steel plane frames . Journal of Constructional Steel Research. (2003).

DOI: 10.1016/s0143-974x(03)00004-x

Google Scholar

[6] Frye,J. M and Morris, Analysis of flexibly connected steel frames, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada, 1975, 2 280-291.

DOI: 10.1139/l75-026

Google Scholar