[1]
Novak, M. and Sheta, M. (1982). Dynamic response of piles and pile groups. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference Numerical Methods Offshore Piling. Austin: 1-18.
Google Scholar
[2]
Pak, R.Y.S. (1985). Dynamic response of a partially embedded bar under transverse excitations. California Institute of Technology, California.
Google Scholar
[3]
Lee, B. K., Jeong, J. S., Fan, L. G., et al. (1999). Free vibrations of tapered piles embedded partially in Winkler type foundations. Journal of Civil Engineering, KSCE, 3(2): 195-203.
DOI: 10.1007/bf02829059
Google Scholar
[4]
Heelis, M. E. (1996). Stability of fully and partially embedded beam-columns in homogeneous and non-homogeneous elastic Winkler foundations. PhD thesis, Trinity College, University of Dublin.
Google Scholar
[5]
Budkowska, B. B. and Szymczak, C. (1997). Initial post-buckling behavior of piles partially embedded in soil. Computers and Structures, 62(5): 831-835.
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7949(96)00302-1
Google Scholar
[6]
Catal, H. H. (2006). Free vibration of semi-rigid connected and partially embedded piles with the effects of the bending moment, axial and shear force. Engineering Structures, 28(14): 1911-(1918).
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2006.03.018
Google Scholar
[7]
Hughes, D., Ramey, G. E. and Hughes, M. L. (2007). Bridge pile bent number of piles and X-bracing system: impact on pushover capacity as scour increases. Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction, 12(2): 82-95.
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1084-0680(2007)12:2(82)
Google Scholar
[8]
Ferdous, M. R. (2007). Pile capacity utilization for bridge bents designed using simplified procedures. M. S. Thesis, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.
DOI: 10.31390/gradschool_theses.2429
Google Scholar
[9]
Gazetas, G. and Dobry, R. (1984). Horizontal response of piles in layered soils. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 110(1): 20-40.
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1984)110:1(20)
Google Scholar
[10]
Makris, N. and Gazetas, G. (1992). Dynamic soil-pile interaction. part II: lateral and seismic response. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 21(2): 145-162.
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290210204
Google Scholar