Human Behavior Characteristics Analysis in Teleoperation System

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper is concerned with the analysis of human behavior in teleoperation system. A teleoperation experimental system is developed in this paper. The stability of the inverted pendulum is controled by joystick. The Laminar Phase and power spectrum is adopted to analyse human behavior characteristics. The experiment results show that human is adaptive to the disturbance in the teleoperation system.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

163-166

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] K. Funasaka, M. iwase and S. Hatakeyama, The design of a human operation system", Tokeo Denki University Graduate school of Science and Engineering studies graduate course Master, s Programs thesis summary, Vol. 24(2005), pp.177-180.

Google Scholar

[2] Masami Iwase, Toshiya Tajiri, Kenji Unno, and Shoshiro Hatakeyama, Human dexterity analysis in machine operation process of a linear motor, Proceedings of the 4th COE Workshop on Human Adaptive Mechatrinics (HAM), 2-3 March 2007, Tokyo Denki University, Japan, pp.125-131.

DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2007.4434909

Google Scholar

[3] Juan L. Cabrera and Hohn G. Milton, On-Off Intermittency in a Human Balancing Task, The American Physical Society, Vol. 89(2002), No. 15.

Google Scholar

[4] Wei Ding, Lili Pei, Hongyi Li. The Effects of Time Delay of Internet on Characteristics of Human Behaviors, Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Networking, Sensing and Control, Okayama, Japan, March 26-29, (2009).

DOI: 10.1109/icnsc.2009.4919327

Google Scholar

[5] Fei S K J: MATLAB7 Application . (Publishing Housse of Electronics Industry , Beijing 2005).

Google Scholar

[6] K. Furuta, Controll of Pendulum: From Super Mechano-System to Human Adaptive Mechatronics, Proc. of the 42nd IEEE CDC, Plenary Talk, pp.1498-1507, (2003).

DOI: 10.1109/cdc.2003.1272824

Google Scholar

[7] M. Iwase, S. Hatakeyama and K. Furuta, Analysis of intermittent control systems by human operation, IECON 2005, pp.56-60, (2005).

Google Scholar

[8] I. D. Loram, S. M. Kelly, and M. Lakie. Human balancing of an inverted pendulum: is sway size controlled by ankle impedance? J. Physiol. (London), pp.879-891, (2001).

DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7793.2001.0879e.x

Google Scholar