Determination for Tool Edge Geometry and Cutting Conditions by Using FEM Simulations and Experiments

Article Preview

Abstract:

Hardened steel, Ni-based alloys and brittle materials are very difficult to machine using conventional cuttingmethods.A tool edge with a small nose radius can alleviate the regenerative chatter. In general, it is important for conventional cuttingto use the smallest possible tool nose radius. A sharp tool shape has an adverse effect on tool strength and the instability of machining process still occurs. A tool wear model with small nose radius proposed by past researchers is evaluated for predicting metal cutting tool wear when machining the copper. Tool temperature values are determined using finite element methods simulation. These temperatures are related to tool wear measured after metal cutting turning tests on a copper workpiece to determine tool edge geometry in low metal tool model.In this study, the effects of cutting conditions and tool edge geometry on process stability in turningare investigated through experiments and FEM simulations.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

449-454

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] T.R. Sisson and R.L. Kegg: ASME J. Eng. Indus Vol. 91 (1969), pp.558-951.

Google Scholar

[2] J. Tlusty: Annals. CIRP Vol. 27/2 (1978), pp.583-951.

Google Scholar

[3] J. Tlusty and F. Ismail: ASME J. Eng. Indus Vol. 105 (1983), pp.24-32.

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Altintas and M. Weck: Annals. CIRP Vol. 53/2 (2004), pp.619-642.

Google Scholar

[5] I. Minis, R. Yanushevsky, A. Tembo and R. Hocken: Annals. CIRP Vol. 39 (1990), pp.459-462.

DOI: 10.1016/s0007-8506(07)61096-8

Google Scholar

[6] Tlusty, J: Annals. CIRP Vol. 2 (1978), pp.583-589.

Google Scholar

[7] S.A. Tobias and W. Fichwick: Trans. ASME Vol. 80(1958), pp.1079-1088.

Google Scholar

[8] J. Tlusty and M. Polacek: Int. Res. Prod. Eng. ASME (1963), pp.465-474.

Google Scholar

[9] H. Schulz and T. Moriwaki: Annals. CIRP Vol. 41/2 (1992), pp.637-643.

Google Scholar