PSO Algorithm Based on Perception Range and Application in the Constrained Optimization

Article Preview

Abstract:

There is a shortcoming that particle swarm algorithm is ease fall into local minima. To avoid this drawback, this paper insert into a perception range that from Glowworm swarm optimization. according to domain to determine a perception range, within the scope of perception of all the particles find an extreme value point sequence. All the particles that in the perception scope find a extreme value point sequence, which apply roulette method, in order to choose a particle instead of global extreme value. So as to scattered particle, and avoid the local minima.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1294-1297

Citation:

Online since:

August 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Kenndey J, Eberhart R. Particle Swarm Optimization [A]/ Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks[c]. IEEE Press, 1995: 1942-(1948).

Google Scholar

[2] Krishnanand K.N.D. Ghose,D. Glowworm swarm optimization: a new method for optimizing multi-modal functions[J]. Computational Intelligence Studies, 2009, 1(1): 93-119.

DOI: 10.1504/ijcistudies.2009.025340

Google Scholar

[3] Hongxia Liu, Yongquan Zhou. A Novel Hybrid Optimization Algorithm Based on Glowworm Swarm and Fish School [J] (Journal of Computational Information Systems, 2010, 13(6): 4533-4541.

Google Scholar

[4] Arora J S. Introduction to Optimization Design. New York: McGraw-Hill, (1989).

Google Scholar

[5] Belegundu Ashok D. Jasbir S. A study of Mathematical Programming Methods for Structural Optimization [J] International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1985, 9(21): 1583-1599.

DOI: 10.1002/nme.1620210904

Google Scholar

[6] Coello C A C. Use of a self-adaptive penalty approach for engineering optimization problems. Computers in Industry, 2000, 41: 113-127.

DOI: 10.1016/s0166-3615(99)00046-9

Google Scholar

[7] Coello C A C, Montes E M. Constraint-handling in genetic algorithms through the use of dominance-based tournament selection. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 2002, 7(16): 193-203.

DOI: 10.1016/s1474-0346(02)00011-3

Google Scholar

[8] Rao S S. Engineering optimization (third Ed). New York: Wiley, (1996).

Google Scholar

[9] Deb K. Optimal design of a welded beam via genetic algorithms. AIAA Journal, 1991, 29: 2013-(2015).

DOI: 10.2514/3.10834

Google Scholar

[10] Ragsdell K M, Phillips D T. Optimal design of a class of welded structures using geometric programming. ASME Journal of Engineering for Industries, 1967, 98: 1021-1025.

DOI: 10.1115/1.3438995

Google Scholar

[11] He Q, Wang L. A hybrid particle swarm optimization with a feasibility-based rule for constrained optimization. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 2007, 186: 1407-1422.

DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2006.07.134

Google Scholar

[12] He Q, Wang L. An effective co-evolutionary particle swarm optimization for constrained engineering design problems. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2007, 20: 89-99.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engappai.2006.03.003

Google Scholar