In the wireless sensor network routing protocol design, the sensor node monitoring data in multi-hop relay approach to sink node for transmission. For sink aggregation node fixed network, the nearby sink nodes of sensor nodes need to transfer other nodes of the monitoring data, consequently, it consumes large amounts of energy, and it's easy to premature death, making the network connectivity decline, even making the network intersected, shorten the lifetime of the network. In order to solve this problem, from the view of sink node, this thesis brings forward a protocol of SERP, which is a energy balancing routing protocol based on sink Mobility and prolongs the lifetime of network. It adopts the strategy of sink movement which makes the hot nodes inside the network take turns, balances the load among them. In SERP, firstly, the WSN deployment area is divided into finite Virtual cells ;Secondly ,we make the center of each virtual cell as the mobile position of sink node; at last, we confirm the residence time when sink node stays in each position through linear programming. Finally, the paper makes simulation al analysis aiming at above-mentioned routing protocols . The result shows that the inside node energy consumption is comparatively balanced and efficient, and the network lifetime is prolonged effectively.
You might also be interested in these eBooks
Info:
© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved
[1]
R. Walter. Braun, Ulrich Derisch. A Phisical Mobile Radio Model. IEEE Transaction on Vehicular Technology. 1991, 5(40).
Google Scholar
[2]
M. J. Ho, G. L. Stuber. Co-channel Interference of Microcellular Systems on Shadowed Nakagami Fading Channels. Proc. IEEE Veh. Technol. 1993, 5: 568~571.
DOI: 10.1109/vetec.1993.507537
Google Scholar
[3]
M. Nakagami. The M-distribution: A General Formula of Intensity Distribution of Rapid Fading. Statistical Methods in Radio Wave Propagation. W. G. Hoffman, Editor. (1960).
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-009306-2.50005-4
Google Scholar
[4]
E. Sousa, J. A. Silvester. Optimal Transmission Ranges in Dirrected-sequence Spread-spectrum Multihop Packet Radio Network. IEEE J. Sel. Areas commum. 1990, 6(5): 762~771.
DOI: 10.1109/49.56383
Google Scholar
[5]
M. B. Pursley. Performance Evaluation for Phase-coded Spread-spectrum Multiple-access Communication-Part 1: System Analysis. IEEE Trans Commun. 1977, 25(8): 795~799.
DOI: 10.1109/tcom.1977.1093915
Google Scholar
[6]
J. David, A. A. Somasundara, M. B. Srivastava. Multiple Controlled Mobile Elements (Data Mules) for Data Collection in Sensor Networks. Proceedings of International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems. 2005: 244~257.
DOI: 10.1007/11502593_20
Google Scholar
[7]
C. H. Lung, C. J. Zhou. Using Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering in Wireless Sensor Networks: An Energy-efficient and Flexible Approach. Ad Hoc Networks, 2010, (8): 328-344.
DOI: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2009.09.004
Google Scholar
[8]
R. Krishnan, D. Starobinski. Efficient Clustering Algorithms for Self-organizing Wireless Sensor Networks. Ad Hoc Networks, 2006, (4): 36-59.
DOI: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2004.04.002
Google Scholar
[9]
A. Chamam, S. Pierre. A Distributed Energy-efficient Clustering Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 2010, 36(2): 303-312.
DOI: 10.1016/j.compeleceng.2009.03.008
Google Scholar