Comparative Study between Wheeled and Tracked Mobility System for Mobile Robot

Article Preview

Abstract:

Robots are widely used nowadays in industries, commercial and domestic purpose for the completion of task in shortest time interval and accurate operation. In the design of a mobile robot, the main mechanical area on focus is the locomotion mechanism. The locomotion mechanism consideration would include the mobile robot flexibility, versatility and efficiency to complete the multi tasks in different environments, indoor and outdoor. This comparative study was focused on the mobile robot mobility systems between wheeled and tracked. This paper highlights the effects on mechanical design, velocity, energy and flexibility of each mobility system. A hybrid system was suggested depending on mechanical design, energy consumption and flexibility.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

538-543

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H. Zhang, W. Wang, Z. Deng, G. Zong, and J. Zhang, A Novel Reconfigurable Robot for Urban Search and Rescue, International Journal of Advanced Robotic Systems, vol. 3, no. 4, p.1, (2006).

DOI: 10.5772/5719

Google Scholar

[2] P. Moubarak and P. Ben-Tzvi, Modular and reconfigurable mobile robotics, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 60, no. 12, p.1648–1663, Dec. (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2012.09.002

Google Scholar

[3] D. Kim, H. Hong, H. S. Kim, and J. Kim, Optimal design and kinetic analysis of a stair-climbing mobile robot with rocker-bogie mechanism, Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 50, p.90–108, Apr. (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2011.11.013

Google Scholar

[4] N. Enayati and F. Najafi, Design and manufacturing of a tele-operative rescue robot with a novel track arrangement, Industrial Robot: An International Journal, vol. 38, no. 5, p.476–485, (2011).

DOI: 10.1108/01439911111154045

Google Scholar

[5] H. Xu, D. Tan, Z. Zhang, and K. Xue, A Reconfigurable Mobile Robot with 5th wheel, in Proceedings ofthe 2009 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation August 9 - 12, Changchun, China, 2009, p.211–216.

DOI: 10.1109/icma.2009.5246259

Google Scholar

[6] Y. Li, S. Ge, H. Zhu, H. Fang, and J. Gao, Mobile platform of rocker-type coal mine rescue robot, Mining Science and Technology (China), vol. 20, no. 3, p.466–471, May (2010).

DOI: 10.1016/s1674-5264(09)60227-1

Google Scholar

[7] N. Ushimi and Y. Aoba, Development of a Two-Wheels Caster Type of Odometer with a Dual Shaft for Omnidirectional Mobile Robots, Procedia Engineering, International Symposium on Robotics and Intelligent Sensors 2012 (IRIS 2012), vol. 41, no. Iris, p.163–169, Jan. (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.157

Google Scholar

[8] M. Muniandy and K. Muthusamy, An Innovative Design to Improve Systematic Odometry Error in Non-holonomic Wheeled Mobile Robots, Procedia Engineering, International Symposium on Robotics and Intelligent Sensors 2012 (IRIS 2012), vol. 41, no. Iris, p.436–442, Jan. (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.195

Google Scholar

[9] D. Lee, J. Park, D. Hyun, G. Yook, and H. Yang, Novel mechanisms and simple locomotion strategies for an in-pipe robot that can inspect various pipe types, Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 56, p.52–68, Oct. (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2012.05.004

Google Scholar

[10] C. Ye and B. Lii, Design and Basic Experiments of a Shape-shifting Mobile Robot for Urban Search and Rescue, Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems October 9 - 15, 2006, Beijing, China, p.3994–3999, (2006).

DOI: 10.1109/iros.2006.281837

Google Scholar

[11] C. Marques, J. Cristóvão, P. Alvito, P. Lima, J. Frazão, I. Ribeiro, and R. Ventura, A search and rescue robot with tele-operated tether docking system, Industrial Robot: An International Journal, vol. 34, no. 4, p.332–338, (2007).

DOI: 10.1108/01439910710749663

Google Scholar

[12] B. Li, S. Ma, J. Liu, M. Wang, T. Liu, and Y. Wang, AMOEBA-I: A Shape-Shifting Modular Robot for Urban Search and Rescue, Advanced Robotics, vol. 23, no. 9, p.1057–1083, Jan. (2009).

DOI: 10.1163/156855309x452485

Google Scholar

[13] J. V. Miro and G. Dissanayake, Automatic Fine Motor Control Behaviours for Autonomous Mobile Agents Operating on Uneven Terrains, in 3rd International Symposium on Practical Cognitive Agents and Robots (Toronto, May 2010), 2010, p.33–40.

DOI: 10.1145/1967112.1967117

Google Scholar

[14] I. Vincent and Q. Sun, A combined reactive and reinforcement learning controller for an autonomous tracked vehicle, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, vol. 60, no. 4, p.599–608, Apr. (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2011.12.003

Google Scholar

[15] G. Bayar, A. B. Koku, and E. Konukseven, Design of a Configurable All Terrain Mobile Robot Platform, International journal of mathematical models and methods in applied sciences, vol. 3, no. 4, p.366–373, (2009).

Google Scholar

[16] G. Quaglia, L. Bruzzone, G. Bozzini, R. Oderio, and R. P. Razzoli, Epi. q-TG: mobile robot for surveillance, Industrial Robot: An International Journal, vol. 38, no. 3, p.282–291, (2011).

DOI: 10.1108/01439911111122789

Google Scholar

[17] S. Mahboubi, M. M. S. Fakhrabadi, and a. Ghanbari, Design and implementation of a novel hybrid quadruped spherical mobile robot, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, Nov. (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.robot.2012.09.026

Google Scholar

[18] N. S. Roslin, A. Anuar, M. F. A. Jalal, and K. S. M. Sahari, A Review: Hybrid Locomotion of In-pipe Inspection Robot, Procedia Engineering 41, International Symposium on Robotics and Intelligent Sensors 2012, vol. 41, p.1456–1462, Jan. (2012).

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.335

Google Scholar

[19] D. Kim, K. Hwang, D. Lee, and T. Kuc, Mobile Robot Design apply to Design Concept, 2006 SICE-ICASE International Joint Conference, p.2989–2992, (2006).

DOI: 10.1109/sice.2006.314993

Google Scholar