An Overview of Moving Target Abnormity Behavior Identity Technology in Video Sequence

Abstract:

Moving target abnormity behavior identity technology is the one key base of Intelligent Video Surveillance. Object detection technology, target tracking technology, target classification technology has reached full development at present. About abnormity behavior identity technology, there have three technologies: template matching techniques, state-space techniques, Semantics Description techniques. Research situation of these technologies is introduced in this paper, and orientation of technological development of these technologies is also introduced in this paper.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 397-400)
• Pages: 2223-2226
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.397-400.2223
• Online since: September 2013
• Authors: Yue Cong Song, Bo Liu, Min Li
• Keywords: Moving Target Abnormity Behavior Identity Technology, Semantics Description Techniques, State-Space Techniques, Template Matching Techniques

References

[1] Thanthry, N., Emmuadi, I., Srikumar, A., Namuduri, K., Pendse, R., SVSS: Intelligent Video Surveillance System for Aircraft, IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, Vol. 24, Issue 10, October 2009, pp.23-29.

DOI: 10.1109/maes.2009.5317783

[2] Collins R., et al. A system for video surveillance and monitoring: VSAM final report. Carnegie Mellon University: Technical Report CMU, (2000).

[3] Kenech F, Ubiquitous computing challenges in recognizing and predicting human activity, Proceedings of 2004 IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp.3-7.

[4] C. Bregler, J. Malik, and K. Pullen. Twist based acquisition and tracking of animal and human kinematics. IJCV, 56(3): 179–194, Feb., (2004).

DOI: 10.1023/b:visi.0000011203.00237.9b

[5] Y. Yacoob and M.J. Black. Parameterized modeling and recognition of activities. CVIU, 73(2): 232–247, Feb., (1999).

[6] M.A. Isard and A. Blake. A mixed-state Condensation tracker with automatic model switching. In ICCV, pages 107–112, (1998).

[7] C. Rao and M. Shah. View-invariance in action recognition. In CVPR, pages II: 316–322, (2001).

[8] Y. Song, L. Goncalves, and P. Perona. Unsupervised learning of human motion. PAMI, 25(7): 814–827, (2003).

[9] G. Mori and J. Malik. Estimating human body configurations using shape context matching. In ECCV, page III: 666 ff., (2002).

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-47977-5_44

[10] J. Sullivan and S. Carlsson. Recognizing and tracking human action. In ECCV, page I: 629, (2002).

[11] A. Efros, A. Berg, G. Mori, and J. Malik. Recognizing action at a distance. In ICCV, pages 726–733, Nice, France, (2003).

[12] J. -H. Ahn, et al., Human tracking and silhouette extraction for human robot interaction systems, Pattern Analysis & Applications, vol. 12, pp.167-177, (2009).

DOI: 10.1007/s10044-008-0112-3

[13] Zhao, T., R. Nevatia, and B. Wu, Segmentation and tracking of multiple humans in crowded environments. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2008. 30(7): pp.1198-1211.

DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2007.70770

[14] Yang Wang, and Greg Mori, Human Action Recognition by Semi Latent Topic Models, IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 31, pp.1762-1774, (2009).

DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2009.43

[15] F. Lv and R. Nevatia, Single view human action recognition using key pose matching and viterbi path searching, in Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., 2007, p.1–8.

DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2007.383131

[16] J. Yin, et al., Spatio-Temporal Event Detection Using Dynamic Conditional Random Fields, in Con! Rec. 2009 the International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence, pp.1321-1326.

[17] R. Natarajan and P. Nevatia, View and scale invariant action recognition using multi-view shape-flow models, in Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vision . Pattern Recognit., 2008, p.1–8.

DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2008.4587716

[18] N. Robertson and I. Reid, Behavior understanding in video: combined method, in Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis., 2005, vol. 1, p.808–815.

[19] M. Yamamoto, H. Mitomi, F. Fujiwara, and T. Sato, Bayesian classification of task-oriented actions based on stochastic context-free grammar, in Proc. IEEE Conf. Automat. Face Gesture Recognit., 2006, p.317–323.

DOI: 10.1109/fgr.2006.28

[20] A. Bobick and J. Davis, The recognition of human movement using temporal templates, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 23, no. 3, p.257–267, Mar. (2001).

DOI: 10.1109/34.910878

[21] D. Weinland, R. Ronfard, and E. Boyer, Automatic discovery of action taxonomies from multiple views, in Proc. IEEE Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit., 2006, vol. 2, p.1639–1645.

DOI: 10.1109/cvpr.2006.65

[22] T. Mori, Y. Segawa, M. Shimosaka, and T. Sato, Hierarchical recognition of daily human actions based on continuous hidden Markov Models, in Proc. IEEE Conf. Automat. Face Gesture Recognit., 2004, p.779–784.

DOI: 10.1109/afgr.2004.1301629