Performance Evaluation of Vehicle Electronic Stability Program Based on Psychological Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

With the increasing of ESP‘s equipment rate in the vehicle market, how to evaluate and promote the performance of the syetem which the vehicle equipped with is becoming the major issue in decades. In this paper, a method from a psychological perspective is brought forward to build an accessment system for the electronic stability program which is based on the mental factor of the drivers after the great effort on the survey of the appilication of the Ergonomics-Psychology throught the world. The system concluded five factors: workload, situation awareness, trust, stress and locus of control, and formed a questionnaire based on 13 basic questions. After the deployment of the the driver simulator test, the results show that the evaluation system provides a new methold to access the electronic stability program, and should give a bright sight to the subjective-objective correlation of handling and stability.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

754-760

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. FMVSS NO. 126 Electronic Stability Control Systems. Office of Regulatory Analysis and Evaluation National Center for Statistics and Analysis , March (2007).

Google Scholar

[2] Josep Maria Dalmau et al. Active Safety Assessment by Consumer Organizations - Euro NCAP Approach. SAE 2011-36-0024.

DOI: 10.4271/2011-36-0024

Google Scholar

[3] Aldo Sorniotti et al. HIL Testing of ESP Commercial Hydraulic Units and Implementation of New control Strategies[J]. SAE 2004-01-2770.

DOI: 10.4271/2004-01-2770

Google Scholar

[4] Elizabeth N. Mazzae et al. NHTSA Light Vehicle Antilock Brake System Research Program Task 5. 2/5. 2: Test Track Examination of Drivers' Collision Avoidance Behavior Using Conventional and Antilock Brakes, Report No. DOT HS 809 561[R]. Washing ton, D. C: NHTSA, (2003).

DOI: 10.17077/9ail-egi7

Google Scholar

[5] Barry H Kantowitz, Henry L. Roediger III anf David G. Elmes. Experimental Psychology.

Google Scholar

[6] Chen Zhen fu. Status and Tendency of the Vehicle Chasses Control Technology [J]. Automotive Engineer ing ' 2006(2):105-113.

Google Scholar

[7] Müller A, Achenbach W, Schindler E et al. Das neue Fahrsicherheits system Electronic Stability Program von Mercedes Benz [J]. ATZ, 1994(11). 656-670.

Google Scholar

[8] Van Zanten A, Erhardt R, Pfaff G. VDC-The Vehicle DynamicsControl System of Bosch[C]. SAE Paper 950759, (1995).

DOI: 10.4271/950759

Google Scholar

[9] NEVILLE A. STANTON* and MARK S. YOUNG . Driver behaviour with adaptive cruise control. Ergonomics, Vol. 48, No. 10, 15 August 2005, 1294 – 1313.

DOI: 10.1080/00140130500252990

Google Scholar

[10] Wickens, C.D., and J.G. Hollands, Engineering psy chology and Human Performance, Prentice-Hall Inc., Up per Saddle River, New Jersey, (2000).

Google Scholar

[11] ISO 9816: Passenger cars - Power-off reaction of a vehicle in a turn - Open-loop test method. Second edition 2006-12-01s.

DOI: 10.3403/30132403

Google Scholar

[12] ISO 7975: Passenger cars-Braking in a turn-Open -loop test method. Third edition 2006-04-01.

DOI: 10.3403/30116288u

Google Scholar

[13] Kai Ma. Research on Vehicle Electronic Stability Program Performance Evaluation from a Psychological Perspective[D], Changchun: Jilin University.

Google Scholar