Modeling Present Worth of Product Quality Loss of STB Characteristic Based on Service Life Distribution

Article Preview

Abstract:

The product smaller-the-better (STB) quality characteristics are continually changing and out of specification limits because of the constant stress, wear and others after the product is put into use, which will cause loss because of the product rejected and scrapped. On the basis of the quality viewpoint that product quality loss is present worth of a loss caused as a result of its quality characteristics because its quality characteristic is out of specification and lead to product scrap after the product is put into service, the paper establishes the present worth model of quality loss of STB characteristic based on service life distribution, and proposes the calculation method on the probability density function (PDF) of the product service life based on the technical specifications of STB quality characteristic. It takes the concentricity between the inner cylindrical surface and the outer cylindrical surface of the link bushing as an example to analysis the various factors that impact on the present worth of concentricity quality loss in the new model, and contrast with Taguchi quality loss model. The results show that the new model describes an actual loss that a product imparts to society after the product is put into service, and can reflect the quality loss of STB characteristic in the product service process, and is more realistic than Taguchi quality loss model of STB. The new model extends tolerance design of STB characteristic from the manufacturing stage to the service stage.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

846-851

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Taguchi G, Elsayed E A, Hsiang T C: Quality engineering in production system(McGraw2Hill, New York 1989).

Google Scholar

[2] Boping Wang, Hui Zhang, Daying Jing: Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery, Vol. 38(2) (2007), p.150.

Google Scholar

[3] Yueyi Zhang, Mingshun Song, Zhijun Han, Xianglai Chen: Industrial Engineering Journal, Vol. 14(6) (2011) , p.81.

Google Scholar

[4] Jiandong Shang, Kangning Chen: Journal of machine design, Vol. 17(4) (2000), p.1.

Google Scholar

[5] A. Teran, D. B. Pratt, K. E. Case: the Engineering Economist, Vol. 42(1) (1996), p.39.

Google Scholar

[6] Yanming Zhao, Deshun Liu, Lei Zeng, et al: Chinese Journal of Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 48(20) (2012), p.182.

Google Scholar

[7] Yanming Zhao, Deshun Liu, Jun Zhang, et al: Journal of central south university, Vol. 43(5) (2011), p.1752.

Google Scholar