3D Vs. 2D Modeling of Concrete Gravity Dam Subjected to Mining Tremor

Article Preview

Abstract:

The paper indicates the role of 3D modeling of concrete gravity dams in evaluation of dynamic response of dams to mining tremors which occur in mining activity regions. 2D and 3D models of a concrete gravity dam were prepared in order to compare two-and three-dimensional analysis of the dynamic response of dam to mining shock. Firstly, values of natural frequencies obtained for 2D and 3D models occurred to be very similar, but only the 3D model allowed to predict the dam behaviour under longitudinal kinematic excitation. Secondly, the comparison of the maximal principal stresses obtained for 2D and 3D models indicates that the simplified 2D analysis underestimates the values of dynamic response on about 20 %. Three-dimensional dynamic analysis allows to assess internal stresses resulting from mining shock more precisely, since the amplitudes of ground vibrations during mining tremors are comparable in three directions.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2015-2019

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] T. Tatara: An Influence of Mining-Induced Seismicity on Low-Rise Buildings, Scientific Notebooks of Cracow University of Technology, no. 74, Krakow (2002).

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Yamaguchi, R. Hall, T. Sasaki, E. Matheu, K. Kanenawa, A. Chudgar and D. Yule: Seismic performance evaluation of concrete gravity dams, in: 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada (2004), paper no. 1068.

Google Scholar

[3] F. Ghrib and R. Tinawi: An application of damage mechanics for seismic analysis of concrete gravity dams, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, vol. 24 (1995), pp.157-173.

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290240203

Google Scholar

[4] J. Dulinska: Importance of ground motion spatial variability effects on earth dam, International Journal of Earth Sciences and Engineering, vol. 05, no. 01 (2012), pp.1-9.

Google Scholar

[5] J. Dulinska: In situ investigations of dynamic response of earth dam to non-uniform kinematic excitation, Archives of Civil Engineering, vol. 52, no. 1 (2006), pp.37-58.

Google Scholar

[6] ABAQUS, Example Problems Manual V. 6. 11, Dassault Systemes Simulia Corp., Providence, RI (2013).

Google Scholar

[7] J. M. Dulinska: Cooling tower shell under asynchronous kinematic excitation using concrete damaged plasticity model, Key Engineering Materials, Vol. 535-536, 2013, Trans Tech Publications, Switzerland, pp.469-472.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.535-536.469

Google Scholar