Effects of Subsurface Drainage Treatments on Chlorine Content in Mudflat Soil

Article Preview

Abstract:

To improve the soil condition in coastal area, subsurface drainage projects with different depth and space were established, and the materials were bellows combining with 40g/m2 geotechnical cloth and forage; in the study, the economic benefits were evaluated, and the soil samples before and after one typical rainfall were taken and observed. Results showed that the subsurface drainage system was proved to be feasible, with the EIRR of about 14.3%, ENPV of about 2697 $/hm2, and EBCR of about 1.36. On the other hand, subsurface drainage projects decreased the contents of Cl- in different soil layers significantly, especially T4, which obtained the optimum results, decreasing Cl- of each soil layer by more than 50% after the rainfall. From the observation results of the deeper soil, it was discovered that the lower depth was negative to the Cl- elimination in deeper soil layer. In practical, 0.9m depth and 10m space was appropriate for the application. Besides, the management and improvement of later stage were also important, in the reality situation of project conducted, the sludge elimination of the drainage pipes should be regarded as chief issue in later utilization of the drainage project.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2134-2137

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Bakhsh A, Kanwar R S, Karlen D L. Effects of liquid swine manure applications on NO3–N leaching losses to subsurface drainage water from loamy soils in Iowa [J]. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2005, 109(1–2): 118-128.

DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2005.01.018

Google Scholar

[2] El-Sadany Salem H, Dierickx W, Willardson L S, et al. Laboratory evaluation of locally made synthetic envelopes for subsurface drainage in Egypt [J]. Agricultural Water Management, 1995, 27(3–4): 351-363.

DOI: 10.1016/0378-3774(95)01140-e

Google Scholar

[3] Ritzema H P, Nijland H J, Croon F W. Subsurface drainage practices: From manual installation to large-scale implementation [J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2006, 86(1–2): 60-71.

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2006.06.026

Google Scholar

[4] Ritzema H P, Satyanarayana T V, Raman S, et al. Subsurface drainage to combat waterlogging and salinity in irrigated lands in India: Lessons learned in farmers' fields [J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2008, 95(3): 179-189.

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2007.09.012

Google Scholar

[5] Turtola E, Paajanen A. Influence of improved subsurface drainage on phosphorus losses and nitrogen leaching from a heavy clay soil [J]. Agricultural Water Management, 1995, 28(4): 295-310.

DOI: 10.1016/0378-3774(95)01180-3

Google Scholar

[6] Fang Q X, Malone R W, Ma L, et al. Modeling the effects of controlled drainage, N rate and weather on nitrate loss to subsurface drainage [J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2012, 103(0): 150-161.

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2011.11.006

Google Scholar

[7] Kennedy C D, Bataille C, Liu Z, et al. Dynamics of nitrate and chloride during storm events in agricultural catchments with different subsurface drainage intensity (Indiana, USA) [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2012, 466–467(0): 1-10.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.05.002

Google Scholar

[8] Turunen M, Warsta L, Paasonen-Kivekäs M, et al. Modeling water balance and effects of different subsurface drainage methods on water outflow components in a clayey agricultural field in boreal conditions [J]. Agricultural Water Management, 2013, 121(0): 135-148.

DOI: 10.1016/j.agwat.2013.01.012

Google Scholar

[9] Eghbal M K, Givi J, Torabi H, et al. Formation of soils with fragipan and plinthite in old beach deposits in the South of the Caspian Sea, Gilan province, Iran [J]. Applied Clay Science, 2012, 64(0): 44-52.

DOI: 10.1016/j.clay.2011.10.013

Google Scholar

[10] Islam K L, Hossain M M. Effect of ship scrapping activities on the soil and sea environment in the coastal area of Chittagong, Bangladesh [J]. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 1986, 17(10): 462-463.

DOI: 10.1016/0025-326x(86)90836-2

Google Scholar

[11] Roslan I, Shamshuddin J, Fauziah C I, et al. Occurrence and properties of soils on sandy beach ridges in the Kelantan–Terengganu Plains, Peninsular Malaysia [J]. Catena, 2010, 83(1): 55-63.

DOI: 10.1016/j.catena.2010.07.004

Google Scholar

[12] Friedel J K, Herrmann A, Kleber M. Ion exchange resin–soil mixtures as a tool in net nitrogen mineralisation studies [J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2000, 32(11–12): 1529-1536.

DOI: 10.1016/s0038-0717(00)00064-x

Google Scholar

[13] Li Y-T, Becquer T, Dai J, et al. Ion activity and distribution of heavy metals in acid mine drainage polluted subtropical soils [J]. Environmental Pollution, 2009, 157(4): 1249-1257.

DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2008.11.050

Google Scholar

[14] Hou M M, Shao X H, Chen L H, et al. Study on fertilizer N leaching, accumulation, and balance in tobacco fields with N-15 tracing technique [J]. J Food Agric Environ, 2012, 10(2): 1284-1289.

Google Scholar

[15] Shao X H, Hou M M, Chen L H, et al. Evaluation of Subsurface Drainage Design Based on Projection Pursuit [J]. Energy Procedia, 2012, 16, Part B(0): 747-752.

DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2012.01.120

Google Scholar