Performance and Economic Comparative Study of Interlocking Block and Clay Brick Buildings

Abstract:

This paper presents the results of an inquiry into the comparative thermal performance and economic viability of interlocking block and clay brick. To this end, two test rooms of 2.4 m width, 2.4 m length and 2 m height were built. The first room was constructed using interlocking block wall whereas the second room used commercial clay brick wall. Data recorded included room temperature, inside and outside surfaces temperatures of all walls, and solar intensity. The experimental results showed that heat conducted better through the interlocking block than through the clay brick. This was not surprising because the thermal conductivity of the interlocking block is 234% higher than the clay brick. However, the cost of interlocking block wall was lower than the clay brick wall by 34.5%. An economic analysis indicates that the payback period of the clay brick in tandem with a 1 ton, split-type air-conditioner depends on the indoor set-point temperature. The payback period extends over a considerable time, and as such, the interlocking block represents the most cost effective alternative for wall construction.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 405-408)
• Pages: 2893-2898
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.405-408.2893
• Online since: September 2013
• Authors: Nida Chaimoon, Chareonporn Lertsatitthanakorn, Krit Chaimoon
• Keywords: Conduction Heat Transfer, Payback Period, Thermal Conductivity (TC)

References

[1] P. Vangtook and S. Chirarattananon. Application of radiant cooling as a passive cooling option in hot humid climate. Building and Environment Vol. 42 (2007), pp.543-556.

DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.09.014

[2] J. Khedari, P. Watsanasathaporn and J. Hirunlabh. Development of fibre-based soil- cement block with low thermal conductivity. Cement and Concrete Composites Vol. 27 (2005), pp.111-116.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.02.042

[3] American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM C 140-02a: Standard Test Method for Sampling and Testing Concrete Masonry Units and Related Units, ASTM International, Philadelphia, USA (2002).

DOI: 10.1520/c0140_c0140m-17a

[4] American Society for Testing and Materials. ASTM C 67-02c: Standard Test Method for Sampling and Testing Brick and Structural Clay Tile, ASTM International, Philadelphia, USA (2002).

[5] Japanese Industrial Standards. JIS R 2618: Testing Method for Thermal Conductivity of Insulating Fire Bricks by Hot Wire (1995).

[6] N. Chaimoon, C. Lertsatitthanakorn and K. Chaimoon, in Proceeding of the Thirteenth East Asia-Pacific Conference on Structural Engineering and Construction EASEC13 (2013) , in press.

[7] Y.A. Cengel: Heat transfer: a practical approach , 2nd edition ( McGraw-Hill Inc., Singapore 2003).

[8] P. Kongkiatumpai. Study of impact of indoor set-point temperature on energy consumption of air conditioner and greenhouse gases emission, A special study report for M. Eng., Energy Technology Program, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi, Thailand (1999).

[9] D.G. Newnan: Engineering economic analysis, 2nd edition ( Engineering Press, Inc., California, USA 1983).