Model Testing for Two Sides Vertical Anchored High Road Dyke of Reinforced Backfilled Retailing Wall

Article Preview

Abstract:

The aim of this research is to better understand the behavior of reinforced structures of two sides vertical anchored block backfill reinforced retaining wall. A vertical model retaining wall, 3m high and 5m long, which was constructed by reinforced backfill using two sides vertical anchored blocks. The results showed that the maximum lateral wall displacements increased almost in the middle of the wall height with a maximum value above the wall base. The measured earth pressures showed that the horizontal earth pressures exerted on the wall facing are greater than those inferred from the Rankine active state up the 1/3H of the wall and are lesser than those inferred from the Rankine active state under the1/3h of the wall. The measured and the calculated displacements of wall show very encouraging agreement although the deformation was slightly over predicted at the top and bottom of the wall.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

437-440

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] P.R. Chonkar, Review of design of reinforced earth retaining walls for flyovers, The Indian concrete journal, 2001, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp.782-296.

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Chungsik, and K, Lee, Instrumentation of anchored segmental retaining wall, Geotechnical testing journal, 2003, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp.1-8.

Google Scholar

[3] R.R. Berg, R. Bonaparte, and R. P Anderson, et al, Design, construction and performance of two geogrid reinforced soil retaining walls, Third International Conference on Geotextiles, Vienna, Austria, April 7-11, 1986, pp.401-406.

Google Scholar

[4] K.Z. Andrawes, and M.A. Saad, Geogrid reinforced soil walls subject to controlled lateral deformation", Geosynthetic: Industrial Fabrics Association International, Boston, Massachusetts, USA, April 28-30, 1999, pp.1-10.

Google Scholar

[5] K.G. Garg, Retaining wall with reinforced backfill-a case study, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 1998, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp.135-149.

DOI: 10.1016/s0266-1144(98)00003-x

Google Scholar

[6] R.K. Rowe, and D.G. Skinner, Numerical analysis of geosynthetic reinforced retaining wall constructed on a layered soil foundation, Geotextiles and Geomembrane, 2001, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp.387-412.

DOI: 10.1016/s0266-1144(01)00014-0

Google Scholar

[7] E. M. Dawson, W. H. Roth, and Drescher A, Slope stability analysis by strength reduction, Geotechnique, Vol. 49, No. 6, 1999, pp.835-840.

DOI: 10.1680/geot.1999.49.6.835

Google Scholar

[8] M. T. Manzari, and M. A. Nour, Significance of soil dilatancy in slope stability analysis, Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 126, No. 1, 2000, pp.75-80.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)1090-0241(2000)126:1(75)

Google Scholar

[9] R. M. Iverson, and R.P. Denlinger, Flow of variably fluidized granular masses across three-dimensional terrain, A Coulomb mixture theory, Journal of Geophysical Research, 2001, Vol. 10, No. 6, pp.537-552.

DOI: 10.1029/2000jb900329

Google Scholar

[10] J Liu, and L Chen, Numerical analysis stability of retaining wall with relieving plate, Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 2013, Vol. 48, No. 2, pp.720-727.

Google Scholar