Analysis on Difference of Contaminated Normal Distribution PDF

Article Preview

Abstract:

As a very important distribution, contaminated normal distribution play a great role in data processing. The probability density function (PDF) feature of the contaminated normal distribution was investigated. The Kullback-Leibler distance is suggested for measuring PDF difference between mean shift model and variance inflation model. Numerical calculations show that the PDF difference of two kinds of model is related to mean shift parameter λ and the variance inflation factor α closely when the main distribution is the standard normal distribution and the relationship is nonlinear proportional.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1661-1666

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Huber P J, Robust Statistics, New York, Wiley, (1981).

Google Scholar

[2] Jiangwen ZHOU, Classical theory of error and robust estimation, Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica18 (1989)115-120.

Google Scholar

[3] Tukey J W, A survey of sampling from contaminated distribution, in: contribution to probability and statistics. Stanford, Stanford University Press, (1960).

Google Scholar

[4] Staudte R G, Sheather S J, Robust estimation and testing, New York, Wiley, (1990).

Google Scholar

[5] Shijian ZHOU, Yongqi Chen, Kangwei DENG, The robust measure of Lp estimation under contaminated distribution, Journal of Wuhan Technical University of Surveying and Mapping24 (1999)71-74, 89.

Google Scholar

[6] Zhizhong WANG, Jianjun ZHU, Choice of estimation of unknown parameter under contaminated error model, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China9 (1999)852-856.

Google Scholar

[7] Jianjun ZHU, The Theory of errors and surveying adjustment under contaminated error model, Changsha, Central South University, (1998).

Google Scholar

[8] Liyan WANG, Yi ZHANG, Enmin FENG, An estimation method of contamination distribution density function, Journal of Dalian University of Technology43 (2003)551-554.

Google Scholar

[9] Xiaohan YANG, Non-parameter estimation of contaminated data, Journal of Tongji University29 (2001)700-702.

Google Scholar

[10] Yuanxi YANG, Hongzhou CHAI, Lijie SONG, Approximation for contaminated distribution and its applications, Acta Geodaetica et Cartographica Sinica28 (1999)209-214.

Google Scholar

[11] Shijian ZHOU, Shaobing ZENG, The Equivalence of Mean Shift Model and Variance Inflation Model, Mine Surveying1 (1995)8-10.

Google Scholar

[12] Fangbin Zhou, Jianjun ZHU, Yongqi Chen, Approximate estimation of the p-norm distribution entropy, Bulletin of Surveying and Mapping12(2012) 23-24, 36.

Google Scholar

[13] Zelin CAI, Kaican LI, Maximum Kullback-Leibler Distance of Some Conventional Distributions, Journal of Wuhan University ( Nat. Sci. Ed. ) 53 (2007)513-517.

Google Scholar