Experimental Research and Parameter Determination of BMBR Process

Article Preview

Abstract:

The experiment retains the advantages of MBR and improves the inadequacies of the MBR .The following improvement has been made:Substituting traditional macromolecule strain membrane with biomembrane as the separate part of water terminal; Substituting the suspended microorganism with immobilized microorganism.which forms a biofilm - membrane bioreactor (BMBR). The trial results show that the removal efficiency of CODCrNH3-N reaches above 85%90% respectively in BMBR process under the stable conditions of gas-water ratio 8:1 to 10:1 and HRT3 ~ 4h. Meanwhile,BMBR is simple and convenient for process,microorganism is large and volume load is high,investment scale is rather low.Besides membrane fouling can be avoided effectively . Compared with the MBR , BMBR has better economic performance and application prospects.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

268-272

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Mo- e Liu and so on. Membrane technology separation application notes. Beijing: Chemical Industry publishing house, (2001)404.

Google Scholar

[2] Damayanti A, Ujang Z, Salim M R. The influenced of PAC, zeolite, and Moringa oleifera as biofouling reducer(BFR)on hybrid membrane bioreactor of palm oil mill effluent(POME)[J]. Bioresource Technology, 102(6)(2011)4341-4346.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.12.061

Google Scholar

[3] NG C A, SUN D, FANE A G. Operation of membrane bioreactor with powdered activated carbonaddition[J]. Separation Science and Technology, 41( 7)( 2006)1447 -1466.

DOI: 10.1080/01496390600634632

Google Scholar

[4] Pollice-Brookes A. Jefferson B. et al/ Sub-critical flux fouling in membrane bioreactors - a review of recent literature. Desalination, V01/ 174 ( 3)(2005)221-230.

DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2004.09.012

Google Scholar

[5] Drews A. Membrane fouling in membrane bioreactors-characterisation, contradictions,cause and cures[J]. Journal of Membrane Science, 63(1-2)(2010)31-28.

DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2010.06.046

Google Scholar

[6] Lin H J. Xie K. Mahendran B. et al. Sludge properties and their effects on membrane fouling in submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactors(SAnMBRs)[J]. Water Research. 43(15) (2009)3827-3837.

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.05.025

Google Scholar

[7] Ji J, Qiu J P, Wai N, et al. Influence of organic and inorganic flocculants on physical-chemical properties of biomass and membrane-fouling rate[J]. Water Research, 44(5)(2010)1627-1635.

DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2009.11.013

Google Scholar

[8] TIAN Y, CHEN L, ZHANG S, et al. Correlating membrane fouling with sludge characteristics in membrane bioreactors: An especial interest in EPS and sludge morphology analysis[J. Bioresource Technology, 102(2011) 8820-8827.

DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.07.010

Google Scholar

[9] State Environmental Protection Administration, 《Water and Wastewater Monitoring Analysis Method》Committees. Water and wastewater monitoring analysis methods. The third edition. Beijing: China Environmental Science publishing house(1989).

Google Scholar

[10] LI X F, GAO F S, HUA Z Z, et al. Treatment of synthetic wastewater by anovel MBR with granular sludge developed for controlling membrane fouling[J]. Separation and Purification Technology, 46( 3)(2005) 19-25.

DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2005.04.003

Google Scholar