The Exploration and Analysis of Distance Education Teachers’ Professional Development - Based on the Field of Vision of Philosophy of Technology

Article Preview

Abstract:

Abstract. The key of Open University construction is the teachers’ team building, and the teachers’ professional development is the most important part. Open University teachers’ professional development has not fit for our teaching requirements any more. The rapid development of information society put forward some severe challenges to Open University teachers’ professional development. Under the view of philosophy of technology, fit for the request of the new situation, It must have some progress on Open University teachers’ professional development: first, to improve the professional academic level; second, to improve the teaching skills; third, to improve the information technology. Those three parts constitute connotation of professional distance education teachers. In the deep analysis the difference between Open University teachers’ professional development and the reality, base on this reason, they offered a good plan, which we hopefully can enhance, the Open University teachers’ professional level, and also can improve the distance education quality.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2795-2804

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Geng Qiang . The Construction of The Open University Authority - from The Dimension of Philosophy of Technology [J]. People's BBS, 2013, (02): 198.

Google Scholar

[3] JiaoJianLi Wang Xiaodong, Dan qin. Technical Support of Teacher Professional Development: China Literature Review in [J]. Distance Education magazine, 2009. (01) : 18.

Google Scholar

[4] Ding Xingfu. Build First-class Open University Humanistic Conditions [J]. Modern distance education, 2010(05): 9.

Google Scholar

[5] YanQingShan. Ethical Turn" or "Technology Turn, [J]. Dynamic Philosophy, 2002, (10): 29-30.

Google Scholar

[6] LiuMeiFeng. Technology, Education, Technology Education, Technology [J]. Comparative Education Research 2001, (11): 8-9.

Google Scholar