Research on the Evaluation System of Software Industry

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, combining with the current development situation of software industry, using reasonable and applicable research methods and advanced and scientific data collection and analysis methods, based on research on the development rule of software industry, the experience of domestic and foreign development model, and the development status of software industry, it is studied to the evaluation system of software industry from different angles in accord with different factors. Based on drawing lessons from other countries successful experience, combining with China's characteristics and development train of thought, it designs evaluation factors of software industry and forms the evaluation system of software industry which has guiding significance and assessed value.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

415-419

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Lei Chen. The Development Model of China s Software Industry and its Path Selection. Reform, 201009: 27-33.

Google Scholar

[2] LI Xu-hui. Development and research on China s Software Industry. Journal of Jilin Institute of Chemical Technology, 201005: 90-93.

Google Scholar

[3] Cheng Ping , Liu Wei, Chen Yan. Current Situation and Countermeasures of Trustworthy Software Industry in China. Science & Technology Progress and Policy, 201003: 51-54.

Google Scholar

[4] Huang Qian-sheng. Research on Software innovation and Software industry competitiveness. World Economic Outlook, 201009: 66-71.

Google Scholar

[5] Kou Lin-lin. Research on Mode and Evaluation of Independent innovation for Software industry. Journal of Jilin Business and Technology College, 200804: 28-31.

Google Scholar

[6] LIU Ping. Evaluation on the software industry competitiveness in Wuhan city. Economic & Trade Update, 2008S6: 95-97.

Google Scholar