Autothermal Reforming of Ethanol for Hydrogen Production: Steady State Modeling

Article Preview

Abstract:

As increasing hydrogen demand for fuel cell application is expected in the near future, the efficient production of hydrogen is vital enabling technology for commercialization of fuel cell for residences and automobiles. Among different technologies of hydrogen production, autothermal reforming is considered to be thermally self-sustaining that the external heat source is not required. In this work, a steady state modeling of autothermal reforming of ethanol for hydrogen production has been performed. Because the operating condition at adiabatic temperature is designed for autothermal reformer, the estimated function of adiabatic temperature as function of steam-to-carbon (S:C) and air-to-carbon (A:C) molar ratios can be determined. At autothermal condition, the effect of S:C and A:C ratios on the product distributions of hydrogen rich stream is thermodynamically investigated. At fixed reactor pressure of 1 bar and preheat temperature of 200 °C, the favorable operating condition for the autothermal reforming of ethanol is found to be a S:C ratio of 2.0 and an A:C ratio of 1.75 at adiabatic temperature of 639 °C.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

651-657

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Y. -S. Seo, A. Shirley, S.T. Kolaczkowski: J. Power Sources Vol. 108 (2002), pp.213-225.

Google Scholar

[2] D. Ipsakis, S. Voutetakis, P. Seferlis, S. Papadopoulou and M. Stoukides: Proc. 17th Mediterranean Conference on Control & Automation, Thessaloniki, Greece (2009), pp.1421-1426.

DOI: 10.1109/med.2009.5164746

Google Scholar

[3] B.F. Hagh: Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. Vol. 28 (2003), pp.1369-1377.

Google Scholar

[4] T.J. Schildhauer and K. Geissler: Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. Vol. 32 (2007), pp.1806-1810.

Google Scholar

[5] M. Zahedi nezhad, S. Rowshanzamir and M.H. Eikani: Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. Vol. 34 (2009), pp.1292-1300.

Google Scholar

[6] S.H. Chan and H.M. Wang: J. Power Sources Vol. 126 (2004), pp.8-15.

Google Scholar

[7] V. Tsourapas, J. Sun and A. Nickens: Energy Vol. 33 (2008), pp.300-310.

Google Scholar

[8] T.A. Semelsberger, L.F. Brown, R.L. Borup and M.A. Inbody: Int. J. Hydrogen Energ. Vol. 29 (2004), pp.1047-1064.

Google Scholar

[9] M.H. Halabi, M.H.J.M. de Croon, J. van der Schaaf, P.D. Cobden and J.C. Schouten: Chem. Eng. J. Vol 137 (2008), pp.568-578.

Google Scholar

[10] J. Chen and J. Sun: Proc. 46th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, LA, USA (2007), pp.4608-4613.

Google Scholar

[11] Y. -S. Seo, A. Shirley, S.T. Kolaczkowski: J. Power Sources Vol. 108 (2002), pp.213-225.

Google Scholar