A Study of Evaluation Model of Human Errors at Risk for the Petroleum Operation

Abstract:

Because the petroleum production is larger investment, higher risk, and the traditional risk evaluation tools usually gave an evaluated value only, which being not in accord with the actual, the paper introduces the ideas of Value at Risk into the Human Errors (HEs) quantification for the petroleum operation, and develops the the model of Human Errors at Risk (HEaR) to quantify the HEs. The model can in detail depict the actual risk statuses of production system under different risk conditions.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 416-417)
• Pages: 1914-1919
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.416-417.1914
• Online since: September 2013
• Authors: Bao Fa Liu, Shang Hai Liu
• Keywords: HEaR, Human Errors, Model, Petroleum, Risk

References

[1] M.S. Sanders, and E.J. McCormick: Human factors in engineering and design (6th ed. ) (McGraw-Hill Publications, American 1987).

[2] D. G. DiMattia, F. I. Khan and P. R. Amyotte: Determination of human error probabilities for offshore platform musters. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries 18 (2005), p.488–501.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jlp.2005.07.021

[3] Transocean report blames BP for Gulf of Mexico oil disaster, http: /www. guardian. co. uk/ environment/2011/jun/22 /transocean-report-bp-gulf-oil-spill.

[4] P.D. Hollywell: Incorporating human dependent failures in risk assessments to improve estimates of actual risk. Safety Science 22 1–3 (1996), p.177–194.

DOI: 10.1016/0925-7535(96)00014-8

[5] C.W. Johnson: Integrating human factors and systems engineering to reduce the risk of operator 'error,. Safety Science. 22 1–3 (1996), p.195–214.

DOI: 10.1016/0925-7535(96)00015-x

[6] P.C. Cacciabue: Human error risk management methodology for safety audit of a large railway organization. Applied Ergonomics 36 (2005), p.709–718.

DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2005.04.005

[7] P.C. Cacciabue: Human error risk management for engineering systems: a methodology for design, safety assessment, accident investigation and training. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 83 (2004), p.229–240.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2003.09.013

[8] T. Deacon, P.R. Amyotte and F.I. Khan: Human error risk analysis in offshore emergencies. Safety Science 48 (2010), p.803–818.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.02.013

[9] F. I. Khan, P. R. Amyotte and D. G. DiMattia: HEPI: A new tool for human error probability calculation for oilshore operation. Safety Science 44 (2006), p.313–334.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2005.10.008

[10] A.D. Swain, and H.E. Guttmann: Handbook of human reliability analysis with emphasis on nuclear power plant applications. Report No. NUREG/CR-1278, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC (1983).

DOI: 10.2172/5752058

[11] B. Reer: Review of advances in human reliability analysis of errors of commission—Part 2: EOC quantification. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 93 (2008), p.1105–1122.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2007.10.001

[12] E. Hollnagel and P. C. Cacciabue: Reliability of cognition, context, and data for a second generation HRA. Proceedings of International Conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management, SanDiego, California. 20–25 March (1994).

[13] M. Marseguerra, E. Zio and M. Librizzi: Quantitative developments in the cognitive reliability and error analysis method (CREAM) for the assessment of human performance. Annals of Nuclear Energy 33 (2006), p.894–910.

DOI: 10.1016/j.anucene.2006.05.003

[14] P. C. Li, G. H. Chen, L. Zhang and L. C. Dai: Research Review and Development Trends of Human Reliability Analysis Techniques. Atomic Energy Science and Technology. Vol. 45, No. 3 March (2011), pp.329-340.

[15] Source: http: /www. jdzj. com/hot/article/2006-5-18/1226-1. htm.

[16] Source: http: /ycjy. cczu. edu. cn/aq/contents/2-1. htm.

[17] Source: http: /www. RiskMW. com, 2011-09-15.