An Optimization Method for Geometric Error of Machine Tool Based on NSGA-II

Article Preview

Abstract:

Balancing the cost and processing precision of machine tool by the method of error allocation without affecting the machining performances is a critical problem in the Machine tool industry. In this paper, a new accuracy allocation method for multi-axis machine tool based on Multi-body system theory, manufacturing and quality loss costs and relationship between tolerances and accuracy parameters of components is proposed. This optimization method is performed with Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II algorithm using Isight and Matlab software. A three-axis vertical machine tool is taken as an example to demonstrate the method, and the optimization results show that the accuracy allocation method proposed is feasible in the optimization of geometric errors on the premise of satisfying machining accuracy requirements.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

180-186

Citation:

Online since:

September 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Li Xiaopeng, Liu Chunshi, Ma Xiaobo, Li Hui. Improvement Technology and Research Contents of Machining Accuracy for CNC Machine Tools. Modular Machine Tool & Automatic Manufacturing Technique. Vol. 11, pp.1-4, (2010).

Google Scholar

[2] Kang Fang, Fan Jinwei. A Method for Manufacturing Accuracy Distribution and Optimization of a CNC Machine Tool. Mechanical Science and Technology for Aerospace Engineering. Vol. 27, No. 5, pp.588-591, (2008).

Google Scholar

[3] Huang Xiaodiao, Ding Wenzheng, Hong Rongjing. Study on Accuracy Design of Multi-axis Machine Tools Oriented to Remanufacturing. Journal of Basic Science and Engineering. Vol. 15, No. 4, pp.559-568, (2006).

DOI: 10.1049/cp:20060987

Google Scholar

[4] Lu Qiang, Zhang Youliang. Accuracy Synthesis of a Hexapod Machine Tool Based on Monte-Carlo Method. China Mechanical Engineering. Vol. 13, No. 6, pp.464-467, (2002).

Google Scholar

[5] Zhao Xueman, Ni Yanbing, Xu Shujing. Accuracy Design of Key Components for Parallel Machine Tool. Machine Tool and Hydraulics. No. 5, pp.58-59. (2004).

Google Scholar

[6] U. Dorndorf, V. S. B. Kiridena, P. M. Ferreira. Optimal Budgeting of Quasistatic Machine Tool Errors. Transactions of the ASME. Journal of Engineering for Industry. Vol. 116, No. 42, pp.42-53, (1994).

DOI: 10.1115/1.2901808

Google Scholar

[7] Su Shipin, Li Shengyi, Wang Guilin. A Universal Synthetic Volumetric Error Model of Multi-axis NC Machine Tool Based on Kinematics. Journal of National University of Defense Technology. Vol. 23, No. 4, (2001).

Google Scholar

[8] G. Taguchi, Y. Wu. Introduction to Off-Line Quality Control. Central Japan Quality Control Association. (1985).

Google Scholar

[9] Hoo-Gon R. Choi, Man-Hee Park. Optimal Tolerance Allocation With Loss Functions. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering. Vol. 122, pp.529-535, (2000).

DOI: 10.1115/1.1285918

Google Scholar

[10] Yang Jiangxin, Wu Zaotong, Gu Daqiang. Research on cost-tolerance model based on manufacturing feature. Engineering Design. Vol. 3, pp.22-24, (1995).

Google Scholar

[11] Test conditions for machining centres—Part 2: Geomtric tests for machines with vertical spindle or universal heads with vertical primary rotary axis (vertical Z-axis) GB/T 20957. 2-2007 ISO10791-2: 2001, MOD.

DOI: 10.3403/02222895

Google Scholar

[12] DEB K, PRATAP A, AGRAWAL S, et al. A Fast and Elitist Multi-objective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II [J]. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation. Vol. 6, No. 2, pp.182-197, (2002).

DOI: 10.1109/4235.996017

Google Scholar

[13] Test conditions for precision machining centres—Part 7: Accuracy of a finished test piece GB/T 20957. 7-2007 ISO10791-7: 1998, MOD.

DOI: 10.3403/01371743

Google Scholar