Paper Titles
Simulation Analysis of Plain Sluice Concrete Temperature and Stress
p.583
Research on Seepage Characteristics of Deep Cut Canal under Dewatering Well
p.588
The Australian Approach to Residential Footing Design on Expansive Soils
p.593
Study on Microstructure of Remolded Loess Using Computerized Tomography
p.599
Discussions about Modification Issue of Rod Length in Standard Penetration Test
p.602
Analysis of Influences of Weak Joints and Confining Pressure on Rock Mass Strength by Numerical Simulation
p.607
The Research of Squat Silos Dynamic Pressure and Eccentric Discharge Trial
p.612
Study on Effect of Step Height and Load for Large Wind Turbine Spreading Foundation
p.619
Allowable Height Difference between Adjacent Monoliths with Spherical Surface Key Groove in Transverse Joints
p.624

Discussions about Modification Issue of Rod Length in Standard Penetration Test

Article Preview

Abstract:

SPT (standard penetration test) is a geo-situ test method widely used in engineering. However, the awareness on modification issues about rod length of SPT-N has considerable differences. Based on the comprehensive analysis of existing research results, some valuable suggestions are put forward contraposed modification issues of rod length, which can be referenced for engineering practices and further research.

You might also be interested in these eBooks
Civil Engineering, Architecture and Sustainable Infrastructure II View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 438-439)

Pages:

602-606

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.438-439.602

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

October 2013

Authors:

Wei Ding, Qing Liu, Feng Tao Sui, Kang Kang Sun

Keywords:

Modification of Rod Length, Standard Penetration Test

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

© 2013 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

References

[1] Writing Committee of Manual for Geotechnical Engineering, Manual for Geotechnical Engineering, China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, (1994).

Google Scholar

[2] GB50007-2002, Design Code for Building Foundation, China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, (2002).

Google Scholar

[3] GB50021-2001, Survey Code for Geotechnical Engineering, China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, (2002).

Google Scholar

[4] L. Zhu, L. Liu, N. Geng, New Testing Techniques of Foundation, Machinery Industry Press, Beijing, (2002).

Google Scholar

[5] H. B. Seed, et al, Influence of SPT procedures in soil liquefaction resistance evaluations, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 12 (1985) 1425-1445.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1985)111:12(1425)

Google Scholar

[6] A.W. Skempton, Standard penetration test procedures and the effects in sands of overburden pressure, relative density, particle size, ageing and over consolidation, J. Geo-technique, 3 (1986).

DOI: 10.1680/geot.1986.36.3.425

Google Scholar

[7] Kohji Tokomatsu, et al, Empirical correlation of soil liquefaction based on SPT N~ value and fines content, Soilsand Foundations, 4 (1983) 56-74.

DOI: 10.3208/sandf1972.23.4_56

Google Scholar

[8] X. Zhu. Estimating soil geotechnical parameters by in-situ test methods, Journal of Tongji University, 3 (1995) 332-337.

Google Scholar

[9] J. Cheng, The blow counts selection of standard penetration test, Survey Techniques, 1 (2002) 13~15.

Google Scholar