Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithm for Instrument Integrated Development

Article Preview

Abstract:

The integrated technology is the main way for the instrument development. The combination of networked collaborative design and multi-objective optimization method, considering the different product design and development of individual fitness degree, to provide the best integrated development for the product solution. The system of Flexible integrated knowledge management was built for networked collaborative design. The system architecture is flexible hub, to support the collaborative development of decision-making and optimal design of innovative integrated development. Innovative multi-objective optimization algorithm also was established based on networked collaborative design. It is realized to obtain fast convergence of the optimal solution set for Knowledge groups. The individual goals, to achieve the optimal design of integrated development, were achieved.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3487-3491

Citation:

Online since:

December 2010

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2011 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] X. L. Xu, Y. B. Zuo, G. X. Wu. Flexible Developing System for Modern Instrument Manufacturing[J]. Journal of Beijing Instritute of Technology. 17(4): 388-394 (2008).

Google Scholar

[2] Tang Bo, Wang Gengchen, Wang Zhengfan. Analytical instruments and the introduction of instrumental analysis [J]. Beijing: Chemical Industry Press, (2005).

Google Scholar

[3] E. Sprow. Chrysler's Concurrent Engineering Challenge [J]. Manuufacturing Engineering, 108(4): 35-42 (1992).

Google Scholar

[4] X. Jia. A Distributed Software Architecture Design Framework Based on Attributed Grammar[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University Science, (6A): 513-518 (2005).

Google Scholar

[5] S. R. Qin. Intelligent Virtural Controls—New Concept of Virtual Instrument. Proceedings of 2nd ISIST[C], (1): 75-79 (2002).

Google Scholar

[6] E. Zitzler. L. Thiele. Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: A comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach [J]. IEEE Trans. Evolutionary Computation, 3(9): 257-271 (1999).

DOI: 10.1109/4235.797969

Google Scholar

[7] Jiao Licheng, Liu Jing, Zhong Wei before. Synergistic evolutionary computation and multi-agent system [M]. Beijing: Science Press, (2006).

Google Scholar

[8] K. Deb. S. Agrawal. A. Pratap, etal. A Fast Elitist Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm for Multi-objective Optimization: NSGA-II. Kanpur [R]. Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur. KanGAL Rep. 200001, (2000).

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45356-3_83

Google Scholar