Coordinating Motion Planning for a Mobile Manipulator with Multiple Constraints

Article Preview

Abstract:

In this paper, we design a 6-degree of freedom (6-DOF) mobile manipulator and present a method of coordinating motion planning. Through analyzing the structure and motions of our mobile manipulator, we obtain some multiple constraints, including static constraints, dynamic constraints and obstacle constraints. To avoid the multiple results of inverse kinematics, joint angles constraints are adopted. Under the condition of these constraints, we put forward a method of coordinating motion planning to guarantee that the mobile manipulator can get the optimal solution by the maximum fitness method (MFM). The method includes two steps: first, the mobile platform moves from non-operable region to operable region; second, the coordinating motion between mobile platform and machine arm in order to achieve the purpose of dredging and unloading materials. Simulation experiments on the mobile manipulator show the effectiveness of the proposed method.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

437-442

Citation:

Online since:

October 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Y. Yamamoto, X. Yun. Coordinating locomotion and manipulation of a mobile manipulator. In Proceedings of 31thIEEE Conference on Decision and Control, IEEE, Arizona, USA, pp.2643-2648 (1992).

DOI: 10.1109/cdc.1992.371337

Google Scholar

[2] W. F. Carriker, P. K. Khosla, B. H. Krogh. Path planning for mobile manipulators for multiple task execution. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation , vol. 7, no. 3, pp.403-408 (1991).

DOI: 10.1109/70.88151

Google Scholar

[3] G. P. Francois, J. C. Culioli. Optimal positioning of combined mobile platform-manipulator systems for material handing tasks. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, vol. 6, no. 1, pp.165-182 (1992).

DOI: 10.1007/bf00248014

Google Scholar

[4] G. P. Francois,J. C. Culioli, D. B. Reister. Using minimax approaches to plan optimal task commutation configurations for combined mobile platform-manipulator systems. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, vol. 10, no. 1, pp.44-54 (1994).

DOI: 10.1109/70.285584

Google Scholar

[5] Z. Q. Wu, Y. Wang. Dynamic consensus of high-order multi-agent systems and its application in the motion control of multiple mobile robots. International Journal of Automation and Computing, vol. 9, no. 1, pp.54-62 (2012).

DOI: 10.1007/s11633-012-0616-6

Google Scholar

[6] R. O. Saber, R. M. Murray. Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 49, no. 9, pp.1520-1533 (2004).

DOI: 10.1109/tac.2004.834113

Google Scholar

[7] Z. Y. Lin, B. Francis, M. Maggiore. State agreement for continuous-time coupled nonlinear system. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, vol. 46, no. 1, pp.288-307 (2007).

DOI: 10.1137/050626405

Google Scholar

[8] Y. G. Sun, L. Wang, G. M. Xie. Average consensus in networks of dynamic agents with switching topologies and multiple time-varying delays. Systems & Control Letters, vol. 57, no. 2, pp.175-183 (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2007.08.009

Google Scholar

[9] F. C. Jiang, L. Wang. Finite-time information consensus for multi-agent systems with fixed and switching topologies. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, vol. 238, no. 16, pp.1550-1560 (2009).

DOI: 10.1016/j.physd.2009.04.011

Google Scholar