Numerical Investigations for the Effect of Slender Body on Dynamic Rolling Characteristics of a 80°/60° Double Delta Wing

Article Preview

Abstract:

The effect of slender body on the rolling characteristics of a double delta wing is found by comparing the numerical simulation results of the double delta wing and wing-body configuration. The coupled computation system solving the Navier-Stokes equations and the rolling motion equation alternatively to obtain the unsteady vortical flow around the two configurations while rolling. The results conclusively showed the upwash effect of the slender body enhanced the energy of strake vortex and merged vortex.The aerodynamic lag of double delta wing is weak, contrarily, the time lag effect of the wing-body configuration is significant. The asymmetry vortices structure nearby the trailing edge are believed to be the main reason for the unsteady time lag effect.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

286-292

Citation:

Online since:

October 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Ericsson L E. The fluid mechanics of slender wing rock. Journal of Aircraft. 21 (1984) 322-328.

DOI: 10.2514/3.44967

Google Scholar

[2] Ericsson L E. Wing rock of nonslender delta wings. Journal of Aircraft. 38(2001) 36-41.

DOI: 10.2514/2.2731

Google Scholar

[3] Liu W, Yang X L, Zhang H X, et al. A review on investigations of wing rock problems under high angle of attack. Advances in mechanics. 38(2008) 214-228.

Google Scholar

[4] G Atashbaz, M Ommian. Experimental investigation of vortex flow over an 80 degree/60 degree double delta wing at sideslip. Journal of Aircraft. 43(2006) 840-842.

DOI: 10.2514/1.13642

Google Scholar

[5] Liu X, Lin J Z, Chen L Z, et al. Numerical simulation of unsteady flow around double-delta wing during pitching motion. Acta Aeronautica et Astronautica Sinica. 33(2012) 984-993.

Google Scholar

[6] Myong Hwan Sohn, Jo Won Chang. Effect of a centerbody on the vortex flow of a double-delta wing with leading edge extension. Aerospace Science and Technology. 14(2010) 11-18.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2009.11.004

Google Scholar

[7] Shigeru A, Yasuhiro T, Shigeki T, et al. A study on aerodynamic characteristics of lifting body and wing body configurations for fully reusable launch vehicles. AIAA-2004-2536.

DOI: 10.2514/6.2004-2536

Google Scholar

[8] Li G N. Numerical simulations of Navier-Stokes flows about full aircraft configuration and the developing of CFD program. Xi'an: Northwestern Polytechnical University, (2010).

Google Scholar

[9] Spalart P, Allmaras S. A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. AIAA-92-0439.

Google Scholar

[10] Roe P. Approximate riemann solvers, parametric vectors,and difference schemes. Journal of computational physics. 43(1981) 357-372.

DOI: 10.1016/0021-9991(81)90128-5

Google Scholar

[11] Rizzi A, Eliasson P, Lindblad I, et al. The engineering of multiblock/multigrid software for navier-stokes flows on structured meshes. Computers & Fluids. 22(1993) 341-367.

DOI: 10.1016/0045-7930(93)90065-h

Google Scholar

[12] Michel Lesoinne, Charbel Farhat. Geometric conservation laws for flow problems with moving boundaries and deformable meshes and their impact on aeroelastic computations. Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering. 134(1996) 71-90.

DOI: 10.1016/0045-7825(96)01028-6

Google Scholar

[13] Landon R H. NACA0012 oscillatory and transient pitching. AGARD Report 702, (1982).

Google Scholar

[14] Li F W, E Q, Li J, et al. Mesh Generation technique for complex aerodynamic configurations. Acta Aerodynamic Sinica. 16(1998) 89-96.

Google Scholar