The Strength Research of Pressure Pipeline Reinforced with CFRP

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to make the pressure safe, a new method and material for reinforcing pipelines is introduced, that is carbon fiber reinforced polymer sheet. In the experiment, the metal pipelines that wrapped with different layers of CFRP sheets respectively are carried loads by hydrostatic burst test. The results show that this method can be a substantial reinforcement in the bearing capacity of the metal pipelines. According to the test data and the thin wall cylinder stress calculation theory, the design formula of reinforcing layer thickness of CFRP was presented in the elastic and plastic state of metal material. Based on the plastic solution of thick wall cylinder in the polar coordinates, the strength checking formulas of repair system was presented in different mechanical states. The presented formulas without iterative calculation have practical value in the production practice.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1405-1408

Citation:

Online since:

November 2013

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Baker WE, Cox PA, WES tine PS, and Kulesz JJ, Strehlow RA, Explosion hazards and evaluation, Amsterdam, (1983).

Google Scholar

[2] J.M. Duell, J.M. Wilson, and M.R. Kessler, Analysis of a carbon composite over wrap pipeline repair system, [J]. International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping, vol. 85, pp.782-788, (2008).

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2008.08.001

Google Scholar

[3] S.G. Chow Dhury, Mukhopadhyay, and D.K. Bhattacharya, Failure analysis of a weld repaired steam turbine casing, Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 5, no. 3, pp.205-218, (1998).

DOI: 10.1016/s1350-6307(98)00018-1

Google Scholar

[4] S.K. Clubley, S.N. Winter, On the fatigue and fracture of site splice welds at the River Marble Via duel, Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 10, no. 5, pp.593-604, (2003).

DOI: 10.1016/s1350-6307(03)00022-0

Google Scholar