Effects of Bionic Geometric Structure Press Rollers on Reducing Rolling Resistance and Adhesion against Soil

Article Preview

Abstract:

Press roller is a commonly used tool for compacting soil to a suitable compactness. An ideal press roller should be able to ensure a low adhesion and rolling resistance in a suitable compaction. However, in tillage operation, the phenomenon of soil adhesion occurred widely when press roller worked. In this research, the ventral surface of dung beetles was taken as the bionic prototype and bionic ridged geometric structure press rollers were designed using ultra high molecular weight polyethylene material. Under the same testing conditions, press rollers with different geometrical details were conducted to examine the effect of ridge section diameter, ridge height to diameter ratio and the number of ridges along the circumference of the rollers on rolling resistance and soil adhesion. The results showed that the all bionic rollers exhibited lower adhesion than a conventional roller. While, only ridged bionic roller with suitable size could reduce rolling resistance. The bionic roller with the ridge diameter of 40 mm, dimensionless ratio of height to diameter of 0.5, the number of 12 indicated the lowest resistance in this work, 25 % lower than conventional roller.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

63-72

Citation:

Online since:

November 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Bicki T J, Siemens J C, Crop response to wheel traffic soil compaction, Trans. of the ASAE. 34 (1991) 909-913.

DOI: 10.13031/2013.31748

Google Scholar

[2] Maciejewski J, Jarzebowski A, Experimental analysis of soil deformation below a rolling rigid cylinder, J. Terra. 41 (2004) 223-241.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jterra.2004.04.004

Google Scholar

[3] Hakansson I, Medvedev V W, Protection of soils from mechanical overloading by establishing limits for stresses caused by heavy vehicles, Soil Till. Res. 35 (1995) 85-97.

DOI: 10.1016/0167-1987(95)00476-9

Google Scholar

[4] Peth S, Horn R, The mechanical behavior of structured and homogenized soil under repeated loading, J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 169 (2006), 401-410.

DOI: 10.1002/jpln.200521942

Google Scholar

[5] Marisol T B, Burton L J, Robert A. H, Seeding depth and soil packing affect pure live seed emergence of cuphea, Ind. Crop Prod. 27 (2008) 272-278.

DOI: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2007.10.004

Google Scholar

[6] Johnsto A M, Lafond G P, May W E, Hnatowich, G L, Hultgreen G E, Opener, packer wheel and packing force effects on crop emergence and yield of direct seeded wheat, canola and field peas, Can. J. Plant Sci. 83 (2003) 129-139.

DOI: 10.4141/p01-171

Google Scholar

[7] Taser O F, Kara O, Silage maize (Zea mays L. ) seedlings emergence as influenced by soil compaction treatments and contact pressures, Plant Soil Environ. 51 (2005) 289-295.

DOI: 10.17221/3588-pse

Google Scholar

[8] Tong J, Ren L Q, Yan J, Chen B Q, Adhesion and abrasion of several materials against soil, Inter. Agri. Eng. J. 8 (1999) 1-22.

Google Scholar

[9] Tong J, Moayad Z, Ma Y H, Sun J Y, Chen D H, Jia H L, Ren L Q, Effects of Biomimetic Surface Designs on Furrow Opener Performance, J. Bio. Eng. 6 (2009) 280-289.

DOI: 10.1016/s1672-6529(08)60128-6

Google Scholar

[10] Qaisrani A R, Chen B C, Ren L Q, Modified and unsmoothed plow surfaces-A means to reduce plowing resistance, Inter. Agri. Eng. J. 1 (1992) 115-124.

Google Scholar

[11] Salokhea V M, Gee-Clougha D, Technology showcase applications of enamel coating in agriculture, J. Terra. 26 (1989) 275-286.

Google Scholar

[12] Tong J, Moayad B Z, Ren L Q, Chen B C, Biomimetics in soft terrain machines: A Review, Inter. Agri. Eng. J. 13 (2004) 71-86.

Google Scholar

[13] Ren L Q, Tong J, Li J Q, Chen B C, Soil adhesion and biomimetics of soil-engaging components: a review, J. Agr. Eng. Res. 79 (2001) 239-263.

Google Scholar

[14] Tong J, Ren L Q, Chen B C, Geometrical morphology, chemical constitution and wettability of body surfaces of soil animals, Inter. Agri. Eng. J. 3 (1994) 59-68.

Google Scholar

[15] Ren L Q, Cong Q, Tong J, Chen B C, Reducing adhesion of soil against loading shovel using bionic electro-osmosis method, J. Terra. 38 (2001) 211-219.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-4898(01)00002-7

Google Scholar

[16] Shan H Y, Zhou H, Sun N, Ren L Q, Chen L, Li X Z, Study on adhesion resistance behavior of sample with striated non-smooth surface by laser processing technique, J. Mat. Proc. Tech. 199 (2008) 221-229.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.07.033

Google Scholar

[17] Soni P, Salokhe V M, Influence of Dimensions of UHMW-PE Protuberances on Sliding Resistance and Normal Adhesion of Bangkok Clay Soil to Biomimetic Plates, J. Bio. Eng. 3 (2006) 63-71.

DOI: 10.1016/s1672-6529(06)60009-7

Google Scholar

[18] Soni P, Salokhe V M, Nakashima H. Modification of a mouldboard plough surface using arrays of polyethylene protuberances, J. Terra. 44 (2007) 411-422.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jterra.2007.11.001

Google Scholar

[19] Ren L Q, Han Z W, Li J Q, Tong J, Effects of non-smooth characteristics on bionic bulldozer blades in resistance reduction against soil, J. Terra. 39 (2002) 221-230.

DOI: 10.1016/s0022-4898(03)00012-0

Google Scholar

[20] Chinese Academy of Agricultural Mechanization Science (CAAMS), Agricultural Machine Design Manual, Machine-Building Industry Press, Beijing, (2007).

Google Scholar

[21] Bailey A C, A model for agricultural soil compaction, J. Agric. Eng. Res. 33 (1986) 257-262.

Google Scholar