Rate-Dependent Constitutive Model Coupled with Temperature Softening for Open-Cell Aluminum Foam

Article Preview

Abstract:

Both quasi-static compressive tests and dynamic loading tests on the open-cell aluminum foam made of 6061 aluminum alloy were firstly conducted. The Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) apparatus was used to perform the dynamic loading tests. The rate-dependent constitutive model for the open-cell aluminum foam was then studied. Based on the empirical constitutive model proposed by Sherwood for polyurethane foam, a new function was found to analyze the three-stage characteristic of quasi-static stress-strain curve of the aluminum foam. Moreover, the temperature softening was also modified. Thus a new strain rate hardening constitutive model coupled with temperature softening for the open-cell aluminum foam was obtained. Finally, both Taylor impact tests and finite element analysis (FEA) were conducted to verify the new constitutive model and the results show that the model was reliable.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

70-75

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] L. J. Gibson: Annual Review of Materials Science, 30(2000), pp.191-227.

Google Scholar

[2] Z. H. WANG, X. Q. CAO, H. W. MA, et. al . Explosion and Shock Waves, 26(2006), pp.46-52.

Google Scholar

[3] L. L. Hu, X. Q. Huang, H. Zhang, et al. Journal of South China University of Technology (Natural Science Edition), 32(2004), pp.87-91.

Google Scholar

[4] J. H. ZHU, Z. H. WANG, F. S. WANG, et. al . Structure and Environment Engneering, 35(2008), pp.43-48.

Google Scholar

[5] Z. H. WANG, L. JING, L. M. ZHAO. Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 3(2011), pp.449-454.

Google Scholar

[6] K. C. Rusch. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 13(1969), pp.2297-2311.

Google Scholar

[7] A. Nagy, W. L. Ko. Journal of Cellular Plastics, 10(1974), pp.127-134.

Google Scholar

[8] J. A. Sherwood, C. C. Frost. Polymer Engineering and Science, 32(1992), pp.1138-1146.

Google Scholar

[9] Q. L. LIU, G. SUBHASH and X. L. GAO. Journal of Porous Materials, 12(2005), pp.233-248.

Google Scholar

[10] Q. L. LIU, G. Subhash. Polymer engineering and science, 44(2004), pp.463-473.

Google Scholar

[11] H. Kolsky. Proceeding of physical Society of London, B62(1949), pp.676-700.

Google Scholar

[12] M. F. Ashby, A. G. Evans, N.A. Fleck, et. al . Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000, in press.

Google Scholar

[13] V. S. Deshpande, N. A. Fleck. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 48(2000), pp.1253-1276.

Google Scholar

[14] B. J. PANG, W. Zheng, Y. Chen. Journal of vibration and shock, 32(2013), pp.154-158.

Google Scholar