Parametric Study of an Electromagnetic Energy Harvester

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper presents two important parameters for an electromagnetic energy harvester exploiting various shaker excitation frequencies: (1) number of turns of the coil and (2) length of the beams for the device. This system consists of a cantilever beam based which represent a spring element of the system, permanent NdFeB magnet, coil system and wiring system to be connected to the data acquisition system. It is found that the induced voltage is proportional to the increment of the number of turns and the length of beams. The expected resonance happens at 300 Hz for case (1) and 100 Hz for case (2). The maximum voltage produced by this device is 915.395 millivolts for length 13 cm at 100 Hz excitation and 275.058 millivolts for 1050 turns at 300 Hz excitation. Experimental data have demonstrated that the geometry and number of turns of the coil would affect the performance of the energy harvester while excitation frequency as a non-physical factor also contributes to its effectiveness.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

113-118

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] E. Bertoldi and S. Berger, Report on Energy, European Commission2008.

Google Scholar

[2] D. Arnold, Review of microscale magnetic power generation, IEEE Transactions of Magnetics, vol. 43, p.3940–3951, (2007).

DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2007.906150

Google Scholar

[3] P. D. Mitcheson, P. Miao, B. H. Stark, E. M. Yeatman, A. S. Holmes, and T. C. Green, MEMS electrostatic micropower generator for low frequency operation, Sensors and Actuators A: Physical, vol. 115, pp.523-529, (2004).

DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2004.04.026

Google Scholar

[4] S. R. Anton and H. A. Sodano, A review of power harvesting using piezoelectric materials, Smart Materials Structure, vol. 16, pp. R1-21, (2007).

DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/16/3/r01

Google Scholar

[5] B. B. Owens, Batteries for implantable biomedical devices, (1986).

Google Scholar

[6] A. Flowerday and R. Smith, Lessons learnt from long-term chronic condition monitoring, I. C. London, Ed., ed, April 2004, p.48.

Google Scholar

[7] S. Roundy, On the Effectiveness of Vibration-based Energy Harvesting, Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures, vol. 16, pp.809-823, (2005).

DOI: 10.1177/1045389x05054042

Google Scholar

[8] P. D. Mitcheson, T. C. Green, E. M. Yeatman, and A. S. Holmes, Architectures for vibration-driven micropower generators, Microelectromechanical Systems, Journal of, vol. 13, pp.429-440, (2004).

DOI: 10.1109/jmems.2004.830151

Google Scholar

[9] P. D. Mitcheson, E. M. Yeatman, G. K. Rao, A. S. Holmes, and T. C. Green, Energy Harvesting From Human and Machine Motion for Wireless Electronic Devices, Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 96, pp.1457-1486, (2008).

DOI: 10.1109/jproc.2008.927494

Google Scholar

[10] S. P. Beeby and T. Odonnell, Electromagnetic energy harvesting, in Energy Harvesting Technologies, S. Priya and D. J. Inman, Eds., ed: Springer, 2009, pp.129-161.

DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-76464-1_5

Google Scholar

[11] C. B. William and R. B. Yates, Analysis of a micro-electric generator for microsystems, Sensors and Actuators, A Physical, vol. 52, pp.8-11, (1996).

DOI: 10.1016/0924-4247(96)80118-x

Google Scholar