A Novel Clustering Routing Protocol with Community Structure Detection for Wireless Sensor Networks

Article Preview

Abstract:

A wireless sensor network (WSN) is a large collection of sensor nodes with limited power supply and constrained computational capability. Clustering routing method in wireless sensor networks has been considered as an important field of research recently to prolong the network lifetime of WSNs. We present a novel clustering method that can balance the energy consumption and extend the lifetime of WSN. Network nodes can be divided into densely connected subgroups through the algorithm of detecting community structure in complex networks. Moreover, the role of cluster-head is scheduled among the cluster members according to the residual energy of nodes, and then the cluster heads send the data to the sink directly. Based on the community clustering strategy, a novel routing protocol, called community structure clustering routing protocol (CSCR), has been raised for WSN. Performance evaluation has shown that the proposed method can achieve improvement compared with LEACH and SEP.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

460-465

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] I.F. Akyildiz, W. Su, Y. Sankarasubramaniam and E. Cayirci. A survey on sensor networks, Communications Magazine, IEEE, 40 (2002) 102-114.

DOI: 10.1109/mcom.2002.1024422

Google Scholar

[2] Y. Chen, Q. Zhao. On the lifetime of wireless sensor networks, Communications Letters, IEEE, 9 (2005) 976-978.

Google Scholar

[3] K. Akkaya, M. Younis. A survey on routing protocols for wireless sensor networks, Ad Hoc Networks, 3 (2005) 325-349.

DOI: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2003.09.010

Google Scholar

[4] S. Banerjee, S. Khuller. A clustering scheme for hierarchical control in multi-hop wireless networks, INFOCOM 2001. Twentieth Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and Communications Societies. Proceedings. IEEE, 2001, pp.1028-1037.

DOI: 10.1109/infcom.2001.916296

Google Scholar

[5] M. Handy, M. Haase and D. Timmermann. Low energy adaptive clustering hierarchy with deterministic cluster-head selection, Mobile and Wireless Communications Network, 2002. 4th International Workshop on. IEEE, 2002, pp.368-372.

DOI: 10.1109/mwcn.2002.1045790

Google Scholar

[6] M. Ye, C. Li, G. Chen and J. Wu. EECS: an energy efficient clustering scheme in wireless sensor networks, Performance, Computing, and Communications Conference, 2005. IPCCC 2005. 24th IEEE International. IEEE, 2005, pp.535-540.

DOI: 10.1109/pccc.2005.1460630

Google Scholar

[7] O. Younis, S. Fahmy. HEED: a hybrid, energy-efficient, distributed clustering approach for ad hoc sensor networks, Mobile Computing, IEEE Transactions on, 3 (2004) 366-379.

DOI: 10.1109/tmc.2004.41

Google Scholar

[8] G. Smaragdakis, I. Matta and A. Bestavros. SEP: A stable election protocol for clustered heterogeneous wireless sensor networks, in: Boston University Computer Science Department, (2004).

Google Scholar

[9] N Jain, SK Gupta and P Sinha. Clustering Protocols in Wireless Sensor Networks: A Survey, challenge, 5. 2 (2013).

Google Scholar

[10] S. Fortunato. Community detection in graphs, Physics Reports, 486 (2010) 75-174.

Google Scholar

[11] M.E.J. Newman, M. Girvan. Finding and evaluating community structure in networks, Phys Rev E, 69 (2004) 026113.

Google Scholar

[12] M. Girvan, M.E.J. Newman. Community structure in social and biological networks, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99 (2002) 7821-7826.

DOI: 10.1073/pnas.122653799

Google Scholar

[13] C.E. Perkins. Ad hoc networking: An introduction, Ad Hoc Networking, 40 (2001): 20-22.

Google Scholar

[14] M.T. Hannan, J. Freeman. The population ecology of organizations, American Journal of Sociology, (1977) 929-964.

Google Scholar