Applied Research on Different Plume Models of Pool Fire in Hermetically Closed Room

Article Preview

Abstract:

The pool fire mathematical model of hermetically closed room is built by different plume models, the time of smoke filling and smoke layer temperature are calculated combined with experimental heat release rate. Theoretical calculations are compared with the experimental results to verify the usefulness of different plume models. The results indicate that: in initial period of fire, the smoke filling speeds of four plume models are similar, and McCaffrey plume model is most close to physical processes; in later period of fire, Zukoski plume model is most close to physical processes of smoke filling; during the fire, the results of Thomas plume model and Zukoski plume model are almost identical, and Thomas model is more suitable for engineering application; the smoke layer temperature discrepancy between theoretical calculation and experimental data is huge, and the theoretical calculation method of temperature is not recommended for predicting temperature in engineering.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

555-561

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] J.L. Bailey, F.W. Williams and P.A. Tatem: Report No. NRL/MR/6180-93-7310, (Naval Research Laboratory, America, 1993).

Google Scholar

[2] Y.V. Nikitin: Journal of Fire Sciences, Vol. 17 (1999) No. 2, pp.97-102.

Google Scholar

[3] Y. Utiskul, and J.G. Quintiere: The International Association of Fire Science Symposium (Beijing, China, June 29- July 3, 2005).

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Utiskul, J.G. Quintiere and A. Rangwala: Fire Safety Journal, Vol. 40 (2005) N0. 4, pp.367-390.

DOI: 10.1016/j.firesaf.2005.02.002

Google Scholar

[5] A. Pearson, J.M. Most and D. Drysdale: Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, Vol. 31 (2007) No. 2, pp.2529-2536.

Google Scholar

[6] B. Karlsson and J.G. Quintiere: Enclosure Fire Dynamics, (CRC Press, America, 2000).

Google Scholar

[7] G. Heskestad: SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, 2nd ed. (National Fire Protection Association, America, 1995).

Google Scholar

[8] E.E. Zukoski, T. Kubota and B. Cetegen: Fire Safety Journal, Vol. 3 (1980), p.107–121.

Google Scholar

[9] B.J. McCaffrey: Some Experimental Results, NBSIR 79-1910, (National Bureau of Standards, America, 1979).

Google Scholar

[10] P.H. Thomas, P.L. Hinkley, C.R. Theobald and D.L. Simms: Fire Research Technical Paper No. 7, (HMSO, UK, 1963).

Google Scholar

[11] Y.P. CHENG, L. CHEN and M.J. ZHANG.: Fire Safety Science, Vol. 11 (2002) No. 3, pp.132-136. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar

[12] C.K. CHEN and B. YAO: Journal of Combustion Science and Technology, Vol. 14 (2008) No. 4, pp.295-299. (in Chinese).

Google Scholar