Two-Dimensional Shear Stress on Bonding Interface of FRP Plate Reinforced Hydraulic Concrete

Abstract:

The bonded interface between FRP plate and the hydraulic concrete is a key part while reinforcing the hydraulic concrete structure with FRP plate. The bond property of the interface directly decides the results of structural reinforcement. In most of the external loading conditions, this interface is under the shear stress state. Therefore, accurate measurement and analysis of interfacial shear stress distribution is the guarantee of FRP reinforced hydraulic concrete structure the premise of success. Focusing on the shear-resisting bonding strength of FRP-concrete interface, this paper improved the ASTM D905 standard shear sample and carried out numerical simulation of shear test to the bonded interface of FRP-reinforced hydraulic concrete structure by adopting the bi-dimensional finite element method, and conducted parameter analysis of the influence factors (elasticity modulus of FRP and concrete, shear modulus and thickness, etc) of shear stress on the FRP-concrete bonded interface and finally the distribution characteristics of shear stress on the bonded interface were obtained. This paper mainly discussed the influence rules of stress concentration to the distribution of shear stress on the bonded interface, which provides theoretical guidance and direction to the shear-resisting bonding strength test in the next step as well as technical support to the processing of FRP-strengthened hydraulic concrete bonded interface.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 477-478)
• Pages: 850-857
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.477-478.850
• Online since: December 2013
• Authors: Lei Zhang, Jin Liang Wang, Kang Wu Zhou, Yong Yang, Bin Zhang, Jun Zheng
• Keywords: Bond, Concrete, FRP, Shear, Stress Concentration Factor

References

[1] M.J. Chajes, W.W. Finch Jr., T.F. Januszka, et al: ACI STRUCT J., Vol. 93(1996), pp.208-217.

[2] J.F. Chen, J.G. Teng: J. Struct. Eng., Vol. 127(2001), pp.784-791.

[3] B. Taljsten: Int. J. Adhes. Adhes., Vol. 17(1997) pp.319-327.

[4] L. Bizindavyi, K.W. Neale: J. Compos. Constr., Vol. 3(1999), pp.153-160.

[5] J. Longworth: FOREST PROD J., Vol. 27(1977), pp.19-23.

[6] ASTM. Standard methods of Testing Small Clear Specimens of Timber: D143. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, (2009).

[7] ASTM. Standard Test Method for Strength Properties of Adhesive Bonds in Shear by Compression Loading: ASTM D905. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International, (2008).

[8] E.A. Okkonen, B.H. River: FOREST PROD J., Vol. 39(1989), pp.43-50.

[9] J.M. Yavorsky, J.H. Cunningham: FOREST PROD J., Vol. 5(1955), pp.80-84.

[10] B.M. Radcliffe, S.K. Suddarth: FOREST PROD J., Vol. 5(1955), pp.131-135.

[11] S.M. Cramer, J.R. Goodma, J. Bodlg, et al. Failure modeling of wood structural members. Fort Collins, Colorado: Colorado State University, 1984: 51.

[12] D.M. Moses, H.G.L. Prion: Compos. B: Eng., Vol. 35(2004), pp.251-261.

[13] A. Sretenovic, U. Muller, W. Gindl, et al: WOOD FIBER SCI., Vol. 36(2004), pp.302-310.

[14] E. Barbero, J. Davalos, U. Munipalle: J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., Vol. 13(1994), pp.835-854.

[15] H.B. Pham, R. Al Mahaidi: J. Compos. Constr., Vol. 10(2006), pp.48-59.

[16] A.M. Malek, H. Saadatmanesh, M.R. Ehsani: ACI STRUCT J., Vol. 95(1998), pp.142-152.

[17] H. Saadatmanesh, A.M. Malek: J. Compos. Constr., Vol. 2(1998), pp.158-164.

[18] Z.S. Wu, H.D. Niu: J. Struct. Eng., Vol. 46(2000), pp.1431-1441.

[19] E.J. Barbero: Introduction to Composite Materials Design (Taylor and Francis, 1999).