[1]
F. Damanpour; S. Gopalakrishnan. Theories of Organizational Structure and Innovation Adoption: the Role of Environmental Change. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. Vol. 15 (1998), pp.1-24.
DOI: 10.1016/s0923-4748(97)00029-5
Google Scholar
[2]
E. Brynjolfsson; L. M. Hitt. Computing Productivity: Firm-level Evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 85, No. 4(2003), pp.793-808.
DOI: 10.1162/003465303772815736
Google Scholar
[3]
R. Drazin; A. H. Van de Ven. Alternative Forms of Fit in Contingency Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 30, No. 4 (1985), pp.514-539.
DOI: 10.2307/2392695
Google Scholar
[4]
L. Donaldson. Strategy and Structural Adjustment to Regain Ft and Performance: In Defense of Contingency Theory. Journal of Management Studies. Vol. 24, No. 1 (1987), p.1–24.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1987.tb00444.x
Google Scholar
[5]
M.M. Crossan; M. Apaydin. A Multi-Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Management Studies. Vol. 47, No. 6(2010), pp.1154-1190.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x
Google Scholar
[6]
F. Damanpour; W.M. Even. Organizational Innovation and Performance: the Problem of Organizational lag. Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 29(1984), pp.392-409.
DOI: 10.2307/2393031
Google Scholar
[7]
F. Damanpour; S. Gopalakrishnan. The Dynamics of the Adoption of Product and Process Innovations in Organizations. Journal of Management Studies. Vol. 38, No. 1 (2001), pp.45-65.
DOI: 10.1111/1467-6486.00227
Google Scholar
[8]
R.D. Dewar; J.E. Dutton. The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis. Management Science. Vol. 32 (1986), pp.1422-1433.
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1422
Google Scholar
[9]
R. B Ducan. The Ambidextrous Organization: Designing Dual Structures for Innovation. The Management of Organization. Vol. 1 (1976), pp.167-188.
Google Scholar
[10]
F. Damanpour; S. Gopalakrishnan. The Dynamics of the Adoption of Product and Process Innovations in Organizations. Journal of Management Studies. Vol. 38, No. 1 (2011), pp.45-65.
DOI: 10.1111/1467-6486.00227
Google Scholar
[11]
Li-Min Chuang; Chun-Chu Liu; Wen-Chia Tsai; Chien-Min Huang. Towards an Analytical Framework of Organizational Innovation in the Service Industry. African Journal of Business Management. Vol. 4, No. 5 (2010), pp.790-799.
Google Scholar
[12]
W. M. Evan. Organizational Lag. Human organizations. Vol. 25 (1966), pp.51-53.
Google Scholar
[13]
N. Venkatraman. The Concept of Fit in Strategy Research: toward Verbal and Statistical Correspondence. Academy of Management Review. Vol. 14, No. 3 (1989), pp.423-444.
DOI: 10.5465/amr.1989.4279078
Google Scholar
[14]
H. W. Volberda; N. van der Weerdt; E. Verwaal; M. Stienstra; A. J. Verdu. Contingency Fit, Institutional fit, and Firm Performance: a Metafit Approach to Organization-Environment Relationships. Organization Science. Vol. 23, No. 4 (2012).
DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0687
Google Scholar
[15]
R. Drazin; A. H. Van de Ven. Alternative Forms of Fit in Contingency Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 30, No. 4 (1985), pp.514-539.
DOI: 10.2307/2392695
Google Scholar