A Framework of Fit Status of Organizational Innovation: Based on the Typology of Organizational Lag

Article Preview

Abstract:

This paper discusses the fit between different types of organizational innovation (OI) : administrative innovation (AI) and technical innovation (TI). As different type of innovation requires different organizational skills, resource allocation and environment conditions, there always exists organizational lag, which changes inversely with organization performance (OP). Based on the dimensions of OI from different theories, this paper selected the rate and the speed of innovation to describe organizational lag and proposed organizational lag vector to represent the fit status of innovation. Organizational lag vector has two characteristics: absolute value and direction. After comparing the referential organizations with different OP, the absolute value could be divided into three categories, then combined with four directions of organization lag vector, this paper described 12 types of the fit status of OI as well as some targeted strategies and implicated management practice.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1202-1206

Citation:

Online since:

December 2013

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] F. Damanpour; S. Gopalakrishnan. Theories of Organizational Structure and Innovation Adoption: the Role of Environmental Change. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management. Vol. 15 (1998), pp.1-24.

DOI: 10.1016/s0923-4748(97)00029-5

Google Scholar

[2] E. Brynjolfsson; L. M. Hitt. Computing Productivity: Firm-level Evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics. Vol. 85, No. 4(2003), pp.793-808.

DOI: 10.1162/003465303772815736

Google Scholar

[3] R. Drazin; A. H. Van de Ven. Alternative Forms of Fit in Contingency Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 30, No. 4 (1985), pp.514-539.

DOI: 10.2307/2392695

Google Scholar

[4] L. Donaldson. Strategy and Structural Adjustment to Regain Ft and Performance: In Defense of Contingency Theory. Journal of Management Studies. Vol. 24, No. 1 (1987), p.1–24.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.1987.tb00444.x

Google Scholar

[5] M.M. Crossan; M. Apaydin. A Multi-Dimensional Framework of Organizational Innovation: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Journal of Management Studies. Vol. 47, No. 6(2010), pp.1154-1190.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00880.x

Google Scholar

[6] F. Damanpour; W.M. Even. Organizational Innovation and Performance: the Problem of Organizational lag. Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 29(1984), pp.392-409.

DOI: 10.2307/2393031

Google Scholar

[7] F. Damanpour; S. Gopalakrishnan. The Dynamics of the Adoption of Product and Process Innovations in Organizations. Journal of Management Studies. Vol. 38, No. 1 (2001), pp.45-65.

DOI: 10.1111/1467-6486.00227

Google Scholar

[8] R.D. Dewar; J.E. Dutton. The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis. Management Science. Vol. 32 (1986), pp.1422-1433.

DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1422

Google Scholar

[9] R. B Ducan. The Ambidextrous Organization: Designing Dual Structures for Innovation. The Management of Organization. Vol. 1 (1976), pp.167-188.

Google Scholar

[10] F. Damanpour; S. Gopalakrishnan. The Dynamics of the Adoption of Product and Process Innovations in Organizations. Journal of Management Studies. Vol. 38, No. 1 (2011), pp.45-65.

DOI: 10.1111/1467-6486.00227

Google Scholar

[11] Li-Min Chuang; Chun-Chu Liu; Wen-Chia Tsai; Chien-Min Huang. Towards an Analytical Framework of Organizational Innovation in the Service Industry. African Journal of Business Management. Vol. 4, No. 5 (2010), pp.790-799.

Google Scholar

[12] W. M. Evan. Organizational Lag. Human organizations. Vol. 25 (1966), pp.51-53.

Google Scholar

[13] N. Venkatraman. The Concept  of Fit in Strategy Research: toward Verbal and Statistical Correspondence. Academy of Management Review. Vol. 14, No. 3 (1989), pp.423-444.

DOI: 10.5465/amr.1989.4279078

Google Scholar

[14] H. W. Volberda; N. van der Weerdt; E. Verwaal; M. Stienstra; A. J. Verdu. Contingency Fit, Institutional fit, and Firm Performance: a Metafit Approach to Organization-Environment Relationships. Organization Science. Vol. 23, No. 4 (2012).

DOI: 10.1287/orsc.1110.0687

Google Scholar

[15] R. Drazin; A. H. Van de Ven. Alternative Forms of Fit in Contingency Theory. Administrative Science Quarterly. Vol. 30, No. 4 (1985), pp.514-539.

DOI: 10.2307/2392695

Google Scholar