Optimization of Development Mode during the Later Steam Huff and Puff in Heavy Oilfield

Article Preview

Abstract:

The M block in Liaohe Oilfield uses steam huff and puff coupled with water flooding, and it has entered the middle-later period of oilfield development. To keep stable yield, the development mode should be changed. Based on the geological characteristics in the M block, this paper puts forward two different ways: Horizontal well injects steam to steam drive; Horizontal well as product well when vertical well injects steam. Combined with practical data and using numerical simulation to analysis, the results show that: Horizontal Well injects steam to steam driving is the best way; the recovery percent is as high as 22.72%. This development mode will work no matter in the short run or getting the economic limit rate.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

628-633

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Yu Liandong. The distribution and development of heavy oil around the world . Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2001, 8(2): 98-99.

Google Scholar

[2] Yang Shengli, Geng Lifeng. The application steam huff and puff in super heavy oilfield . Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2002, 9(6): 16-17.

Google Scholar

[3] Dou Hongen. The discussion of Heavy Oil Thermal Recovery using SAGD technology . Petroleum Technology Forum, 2003(4): 50-53.

Google Scholar

[4] Zhang Rui. The technology of Heavy Oil Thermal Recovery . Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, (1999).

Google Scholar

[5] Liu Shangqi, Bao Lianchun, Ma Desheng. New Technology study for the development of a supper-heavy oil reservoir in Liaohe oil field. PETROLEUM EXPLORATIONAND DEVELOPMENT, 1999, 26(4): 80-81.

Google Scholar

[6] Zhang Yitang, etal. The technology of Heavy Oil Thermal Recovery . Petroleum Technology Forum, (2006).

Google Scholar

[7] Hu Xingzheng. Experimental study on converting to steam flooding after cyclic steam stimulation for Du229B lock in Shuguang Oilfield . Special Oil and Gas Reservoirs, 2009, 16(5): 62-63.

Google Scholar

[8] Shi Xiaoqu, etal. The analysis of converting steam huff and puff to water flooding in Heavy Oil Field.  Henan Petroleum, 2004, 18(Supplement): 44-45.

Google Scholar

[9] Lv Xiaoguang, etal. Reservior Geologic Model and Random Modeling Technique. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2000, 19(1): 10-13, 16.

Google Scholar

[10] Xing Yuzhong, Yan Qibin, YangHuiting. Application OF Stochastic Modeling Technology IN Detailed Reservoir Description—Taking a Fault Block of Dagang Oilfield as example. NATURAL GAS EXPLORATION&DEVELOPMENT, 2006, 29(3): 42. 45.

Google Scholar

[11] Wu Xingbao, Li Shaohua, Yin, etal. Application of facies-controlled stochastic modeling in heterogeneity study. FAULT-BLOCK OIL & GAS FIELD, 2009, 16(2): 58-60.

Google Scholar

[12] Song Kaoping, Song Hongcai, Wu Wenxiang. The theory of Numerical Simulation . Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 1996: 23-26.

Google Scholar

[13] ZhaoQishuang, SunYan, GuoFujun. A Method OF Forecasting Heavy Crude Reservoir Performance Indexes During the huff and puff Process. ACTA PETROL EI SINICA. 1996, 17(2): 47-52.

Google Scholar

[14] Butler R M. Steam-assisted gravity drainage: concept, development, performance and future. JCPT, Feb. 1994, 44~55.

Google Scholar

[15] Stang HR and Soni Y. The Saner ranch pilot fracture-assisted steam flooding. SPE 10707.

Google Scholar