Covering an Unknown Area with an RFID-Enabled Robot Swarm

Article Preview

Abstract:

Our goal is to improve the coverage of an area using robots with simple sensors and simple, robust algorithms usable for any kind of room. We investigate the advantage of the swarm - compared to a single robot - and three different algorithms for the task of searching landmarks in a previously unknown area. The guidance of the robot is based on landmarks, implemented by RFID tags irregularly placed in the room. The experiments are conducted using a custom made simulator of RFID-equipped Roomba cleaning robots, based on our previous work with real-life Roomba swarms. We show that for the simple room coverage algorithms the speedup gained from increasing the size of the swarm diminishes as the swarm grows and most importantly, for larger swarm sizes the information available and the intelligence of the algorithm becomes less important.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1157-1162

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H. Endres et al., Field Test of a Navigation System: Autonomous Cleaning in Supermarkets, " in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. (ICRA), 1998, p.1779–1781.

Google Scholar

[2] R. Murphy, Human-robot Interaction in Rescue Robotics, IEEE Syst., Man, Cybern., C, Appl. Rev., vol. 34, no. 2, p.138–153, May (2004).

DOI: 10.1109/tsmcc.2004.826267

Google Scholar

[3] Y. Huang et al., "Automatic Operation for a Robot Lawn Mower, in SPIE Conf. Mobile Robots, vol. 727, 1986, p.344–354.

Google Scholar

[4] D. Hougen et al., "A Miniature Robotic System for Reconnaissance and Surveillance, in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom. (ICRA), 2000, p.501–507.

Google Scholar

[5] J. Haverinen and A. Kemppainen, "A Global Self-localization Technique Utilizing Local Anomalies of the Ambient Magnetic Field, International Conference on Robotics and Automation, p.3142 – 3147, (2009).

DOI: 10.1109/robot.2009.5152885

Google Scholar

[6] M. A. Batalin and G. S. Sukhatme, Coverage, Exploration and Deployment by a Mobile Robot and Communication Network, in Proc. International Workshop on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2003, p.376 – 391.

DOI: 10.1007/3-540-36978-3_25

Google Scholar

[7] N. Agmon, N. Hazon, and G. A. Kaminka, "Constructing Spanning Trees for Efficient Multi-robot Coverage, in Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, vol. 1-10, (Orlando, FL, USA), pp.1698-1703, (2006).

DOI: 10.1109/robot.2006.1641951

Google Scholar

[8] W. Burgard, M. Moors, C. Stachniss, Schneider, F.E., Coordinated Multi-robot Exploration, Robotics, IEEE Transactions on, vol. 21, no. 3, p.376, 386, June (2005).

DOI: 10.1109/tro.2004.839232

Google Scholar

[9] H. Choset and P. Pignon, Coverage path planning: The boustrophedon decomposition, in: Proc. of Int. Conf. on Field and Service Robotics, Canberra, Australia, December (1997).

DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4471-1273-0_32

Google Scholar

[10] Puusepp, A.; Tammet, T.; Puju, M.; Reilent, E., Robot movement strategies in the environment enriched with RFID tags, in Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on System Theory, Control and Computing (ICSTCC), p.1 – 6, Oct. (2012).

Google Scholar

[11] A. Tanoto, U. Rückert, Local Navigation Strategies for Multi-Robot Exploration: From Simulation to Experimentation with Mini-Robots, Procedia Engineering, vol. 41, 2012, pp.1197-1203.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2012.07.301

Google Scholar