Comparison of Three Methods for Weibull Distribution in Calculating Wind Energy Potential

Article Preview

Abstract:

Three kinds of methods commonly used for estimating Weibull parameters were fitted to a collection of wind speed data at 10 m above ground level for the year of 2009 to determine the best distribution function which describes the wind speed variation at Msila, Algeria site for wind energy. Three methods used the coefficient of determination R2, root mean square error RMSE and Chi-Square χ2 were compared with failure analysis. According to the results of failure analysis the moment method has better results than graphic method and power density method. The wind power density calculated from moment method shows a good approximation to estimate the power density. So the Weibull distribution using the moment method adequately fit the data and it is suitable for modeling the wind speed distribution in Msila province of Algeria.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

574-578

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] H. Mohmoudi, A. Ouaged and N. Spahis: Revue des Energies renouvelables SMEE10. (2010), pp.249-256.

Google Scholar

[2] J. Waewsak, C. Chancham, M. Landry and Y. G. Panayiotou: Journal of Sustainable & environment Vol. 2 (2011), pp.51-55.

Google Scholar

[3] I. Fyrippis, P.J. Axaopoulos and G. Panayiotou: WSEAS Transactions on Power Systems Vol. 3(8) (2008).

Google Scholar

[4] SA. Akdag and A.A. Dinler: Energy Conversion and Management Vol. 50 (2009).

Google Scholar

[5] T.P. Chang: Appl Energy Vol. 88 (2009).

Google Scholar

[6] O.S. Ohunakin, M.S. Adaramola, O.M. Oyewola: Applied Energy Vol. 88 (2011), pp.197-206.

Google Scholar

[7] M. Nedaei: International Journal of Renewable Energy Research Vol. 2(2) (2012), pp.338-347.

Google Scholar

[8] T.P. Chang: Appl Energy Vol. 88 (2011), pp.272-82.

Google Scholar

[9] C.G. Justus and A. Mikhail: Geophys Res Lett. Vol. 3 (1976), pp.261-4.

Google Scholar