Bayesian MRF Modeling and Graph Cuts for Phase Unwrapping with Discontinuity Phase Flaws:A Comparative Study

Article Preview

Abstract:

Phase unwrapping (PU) is a difficult task commonly found in applications involving interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and optical surface profile measurements; all of which involve mathematically ill-posed problems. Conventional algorithms exhibit strong shortcomings in PU when phase discontinuity flaws exist. To simulate these situations, we are custom-designed test data with a phase discontinuity flaw. This simulated data is a 3D Gaussian distribution with an arc-shaped notch as a phase flaw. PU is carried out by Bayesian inference and MRF (Markov Random Field) modeling. A graph cut algorithm is employed for optimization with respect to energy minimization. Three other conventional algorithms are also employed and their PU performance is compared. The results show the good performance and effectiveness of the Bayesian MRF modeling method. These experimental results are important references for phase unwrapping problems when phase discontinuities exist.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

1915-1918

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Shabou A, Baselice F, Ferraioli G. Urban Digital Elevation Model Reconstruction Using Very High Resolution Multichannel InSAR Data[J]. (2012).

DOI: 10.1109/tgrs.2012.2191155

Google Scholar

[2] Ying L, Liang Z P, Munson Jr D C, et al. Unwrapping of MR phase images using a Markov random field model[J]. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on, 2006, 25(1): 128-136.

DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2005.861021

Google Scholar

[3] Ghiglia D C, Pritt M D. Two-dimensional phase unwrapping: theory, algorithms, and software [M]. New York: Wiley, (1998).

Google Scholar

[4] Goldstein R M, Zebker H A, Werner C L. Satellite radar interferometry: Two-dimensional phase unwrapping [J]. Radio Science, 1988, 23(4): 713-720.

DOI: 10.1029/rs023i004p00713

Google Scholar

[5] Bone D J. Fourier fringe analysis: the two-dimensional phase unwrapping problem [J]. Applied optics, 1991, 30(25): 3627-3632.

DOI: 10.1364/ao.30.003627

Google Scholar

[6] Costantini M. A novel phase unwrapping method based on network programming [J]. Geoscience and Remote Sensing, IEEE Transactions on, 1998, 36(3): 813-821.

DOI: 10.1109/36.673674

Google Scholar

[7] Bioucas-Dias J M, Valadão G. Phase unwrapping via graph cuts[J]. Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 2007, 16(3): 698-709.

DOI: 10.1109/tip.2006.888351

Google Scholar

[8] Ferraioli G, Shabou A, Tupin F, et al. Multichannel phase unwrapping with graph cuts[J]. Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, IEEE, 2009, 6(3): 562-566.

DOI: 10.1109/lgrs.2009.2021165

Google Scholar

[9] Flynn T J. Consistent 2-D phase unwrapping guided by a quality map[C]/Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, 1996. IGARSS'96. Remote Sensing for a Sustainable Future., International. IEEE, 1996, 4: 2057-(2059).

DOI: 10.1109/igarss.1996.516887

Google Scholar

[10] Li S Z. Markov random field modeling in computer vision[M]. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., (1995).

Google Scholar

[11] Flynn T J. Two-dimensional phase unwrapping with minimum weighted discontinuity [J]. JOSA A, 1997, 14(10): 2692-2701.

DOI: 10.1364/josaa.14.002692

Google Scholar

[12] Boykov Y, Veksler O, Zabih R. Fast approximate energy minimization via graph cuts[J]. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, 2001, 23(11): 1222-1239.

DOI: 10.1109/34.969114

Google Scholar

[13] Kolmogorov V, Zabin R. What energy functions can be minimized via graph cuts [J]. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, 2004, 26(2): 147-159.

DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2004.1262177

Google Scholar