Test Study on Interface Properties between Different Geogrids and Clay

Article Preview

Abstract:

With the rapid development of reinforced earth technology, different reinforced materials are also gradually applied to Reinforced earth. In this paper, we focus on the need for the study of interface characteristics between different reinforced materials and clay, by making indoor drawing test with two kinds of reinforced materials commonly used in engineering and the same clay. The test results show that: the drawing strength between the two reinforced materials and clay both increase with the normal stress increasing, both of their strength envelopes are straight lines; In the drawing test between the warp knitted geogrid and clay, the cohesive strength is 6.65kPa, the friction angle is 21.03°; while the drawing test between the geonet and clay, the cohesive strength is 2.9kPa, the friction angle is 10.96°; The average tensile strength of warp knitted geogrid is 26.4% of genet's, while the drawing strength of warp knitted geogrid in the test is about 48.1% of genet's, so when chosing reinforced materials in some engineerings, it is an important factor that we must consider the particle size and gradation of the filled reinforced materials, selecting the most appropriate size effect.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2411-2415

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] Wang Dingyi. Application and study on self-anchored retaining wall[J]. Fujian Construction Science & Technology, 2007(3): 5-7.

Google Scholar

[2] National Concrete Masonry Association. Design Manual for Segmental Retaining Walls [M]. 2nd ed. Herndon, Virginia, USA: National Concrete Masonry Association, (2002).

Google Scholar

[3] Li Guangxin, Chen Lun, Cai Fei. A new approach to analysis of stress and deformation of Reinforced earth[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering , 1994, 16(3): 46-53.

Google Scholar

[4] Jie Yuxin, Li Guangxin. Equivalent additional stress method for numerical analysis of Reinforced earth[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 1999, 21(5): 614-616.

Google Scholar

[5] Ochiai H, Otani J, Hayashic S, et al. The pull-out resistance of geogrids in Reinforced earth[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 1996, 14(1): 19-42.

DOI: 10.1016/0266-1144(96)00027-1

Google Scholar

[6] Palmeira E M, Milligan G W E. Scale and other factors affecting the results of pull-out tests of grids buried in sand[J]. Geotechnique, 1989, 39(3): 511-542.

DOI: 10.1680/geot.1989.39.3.511

Google Scholar

[7] Raju D M, Fannin R J. Load-strain-displacement response of geosythetics in monotonic and cyclic pullout [J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1998, 35(2): 183-193.

DOI: 10.1139/t97-088

Google Scholar

[8] Zhang Mengxi, Sun Yuqi, Li Guoxiang. Experimental study of the fundamental mechanism of Reinforced earth retaining walls[J]. Journal of the China Railway Society, 1999, 21(5): 79-82.

Google Scholar

[9] Ho S K, Rowe R K. Effect of wall geometry on the behaviour of Reinforced earth walls[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 1996, 14(10): 521-541.

DOI: 10.1016/s0266-1144(97)83183-4

Google Scholar

[10] Buhan P D, Hassen G. Multiphase approach as a generalized homogenization procedure for modeling the macroscopic behavior of clays reinforced by linear inclusions[J]. European Journal of Mechanics-A/Solids, 2008, 27(4): 662-679.

DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2007.11.008

Google Scholar

[11] Singh S, Shukla A, Brown R. Pullout behavior of polypropylene fibers from cementitious matrix[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2004, 34(10): 1919-(1925).

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.02.014

Google Scholar

[12] Chen T C, Chen R H, Lin S S. A nonlinear homogenized model applicable to Reinforced earth analysis[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2000, 18(6): 349-366.

DOI: 10.1016/s0266-1144(99)00035-7

Google Scholar

[13] Gao Jiangping, Yu Maohong, Hu Changshun, et al. Large model experiment on sliding rupture of Reinforced earth retaining wall[J]. Journal of Chang'an University: Natural Science Edition, 2005, 25(6): 6-9.

Google Scholar

[14] Zhang Wenhui, Wang Baotian, Li Chunhua. Self-embedded building blocks and reinforced friction strength test [J]. Rock and Clay Mechanics, 2007, 28(11): 2431-2434.

Google Scholar

[15] Singh S, Shukla A, Brown R. Pullout behavior of polypropylene fibers from cementitious matrix[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 2004, 34(10): 1919-(1925).

DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2004.02.014

Google Scholar