Evaluation on Comprehensive Protective of Protective Engineering Based on Input-Output DEA Model of Two Goals

Article Preview

Abstract:

In order to solve the problem that the subjectivity of traditional evaluation method and difficulty of testing correlation on comprehensive protective of protective engineering, this message establishes the index system model of comprehensive protective of protective engineering and input-output DEA model of two goals. Based on this, the input-output DEA model of two goals is used to evaluate the comprehensive protective of protective engineering. The example shows that the method in this passage makes effort to compare the DMUs effectively and select the best DMU.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

2768-2774

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

35 DMU2 45 126 25 19.

Google Scholar

35 DMU3 52 127 34 18.

Google Scholar

45 DMU4 49 144 30 22.

Google Scholar

40 DMU5 55 148 28 25.

Google Scholar

60 DMU 6 50 129 22 28.

Google Scholar

65 DMU 7 47 133 29 20.

Google Scholar

70 DMU 8 58 130 37 16.

Google Scholar

55 DMU 9 53 140 30 17.

Google Scholar

90 DMU 10 40 128 27 14.

Google Scholar

85 Table Ⅱ: Evaluation results of Input-DEA DMUj DMU1 1.

Google Scholar

[1] 00.

Google Scholar

[7] 00 0.

Google Scholar

[1] 00 0.

Google Scholar

50 DMU2.

Google Scholar

[7] 17.

Google Scholar

[6] 73 0.

Google Scholar

[5] 43.

Google Scholar

36 DMU3.

Google Scholar

[9] 10 0.

Google Scholar

[5] 33.

Google Scholar

[3] 04.

Google Scholar

17 DMU4.

Google Scholar

[3] 83.

Google Scholar

[1] 49 0.

Google Scholar

[5] 41.

Google Scholar

39 DMU5.

Google Scholar

[13] 04.

Google Scholar

[14] 71 0.

Google Scholar

[10] 11.

Google Scholar

25 DMU6.

Google Scholar

[16] 43.

Google Scholar

[23] 32 0.

Google Scholar

[15] 66.

Google Scholar

19 0 0 DMU7.

Google Scholar

[4] 91 0.

Google Scholar

[4] 92 0.

Google Scholar

10 DMU8.

Google Scholar

[15] 79 0.

Google Scholar

[8] 71.

Google Scholar

[1] 62.

Google Scholar

23 DMU9.

Google Scholar

[9] 11 0.

Google Scholar

[1] 66.

Google Scholar

02 DMU10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Table Ⅲ: Evaluation results of Output-DEA DMUj DMU1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 DMU2.

Google Scholar

[1] 11.

Google Scholar

[7] 96.

Google Scholar

[7] 48 0.

Google Scholar

[6] 04.

Google Scholar

40 DMU3.

Google Scholar

[1] 35.

Google Scholar

[12] 31 0.

Google Scholar

[7] 21.

Google Scholar

[4] 11.

Google Scholar

23 DMU4.

Google Scholar

[1] 19.

Google Scholar

[4] 56.

Google Scholar

[1] 78 0.

Google Scholar

[6] 44.

Google Scholar

47 DMU5.

Google Scholar

[1] 04.

Google Scholar

[13] 52.

Google Scholar

[15] 26 0.

Google Scholar

[10] 48.

Google Scholar

26 DMU6.

Google Scholar

[1] 06.

Google Scholar

[17] 41.

Google Scholar

[24] 70 0.

Google Scholar

[16] 59.

Google Scholar

20 0 0 DMU7.

Google Scholar

[1] 108.

Google Scholar

[5] 44 0.

Google Scholar

[5] 45 0.

Google Scholar

11 DMU8.

Google Scholar

[1] 10.

Google Scholar

[17] 38 0.

Google Scholar

[9] 58.

Google Scholar

[1] 78.

Google Scholar

26 DMU9.

Google Scholar

[1] 02.

Google Scholar

[9] 25 0.

Google Scholar

[1] 69.

Google Scholar

02 DMU10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Table Ⅳ: Evaluation results of dual goals of input - output super-efficiency DEA DMUj DMU Sort DMU1.

Google Scholar

[1] 00.

Google Scholar

[1] 00 0 2 DMU2.

Google Scholar

[1] 11.

Google Scholar

21 8 DMU3.

Google Scholar

[1] 35.

Google Scholar

61 10 DMU4.

Google Scholar

[1] 19.

Google Scholar

35 9 DMU5.

Google Scholar

[1] 04.

Google Scholar

08 4 DMU6.

Google Scholar

[1] 06.

Google Scholar

12 5 DMU7.

Google Scholar

[1] 108.

Google Scholar

206 7 DMU8.

Google Scholar

[1] 10.

Google Scholar

19 6 DMU9.

Google Scholar

[1] 02.

Google Scholar

04 3 DMU10.

Google Scholar

[1] 40.

Google Scholar

71 -0. 69 1 Conclusions Index system of evaluation on comprehensive protection of the protective engineering has been established in this paper, and use dual goals of input - output super-efficiency DEA model according to the characteristic of the index system to evaluate the performance of protective engineering. The established dual goals of input - output super-efficiency DEA model distinguish decision-making units effectively. DMUs are completely sorted. This method may further be applied to the assessment and prediction of the efficiency of other industries. References.

DOI: 10.5937/tehnika1603441v

Google Scholar