Structural Optimization of Composite Panel with Lamination Parameters and Equivalent Stiffness Laminate Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

Firstly, a two-level optimization procedure for composite structure is investigated with lamination parameters as design variables and MSC.Nastran as analysis tool. The details using lamination parameters as MSC.Nastran input parameters are presented. Secondly, with a proper equivalent stiffness laminate built to substitute for the lamination parameters, a two-level optimization method based on the equivalent stiffness laminate is proposed. Compared with the lamination parameters-based method, the layer thicknesses of the equivalent stiffness laminate are adopted as continuous design variables at the first level. The corresponding lamination parameters are calculated from the optimal layer thicknesses. At the second level, genetic algorithm (GA) is applied to identify an optimal laminate configuration to target the lamination parameters obtained. The numerical example shows that the proposed method without considering constraints of lamination parameters can obtain better optimal results.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

429-435

Citation:

Online since:

January 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

[1] P. Jin, B. F. Song, and X. P. Zhong. Structure optimization of large composite wing with parallel genetic algorithm. Jornal of Aircraft, Vol. 48, No. 6, 2011, pp.2145-2148.

DOI: 10.2514/1.c031493

Google Scholar

[2] G. N. Vanderplaats, and T. A. Wesshaar, Optimization design of composite structures. Int J Number Methods Eng, Vol. 27, 1989, pp.437-448.

Google Scholar

[3] B. Liu, R. T. Haftka, and M. A. AKgun, Two-level composite wing structural optimization using response surfaces. Structure and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 20, 2000, pp.87-96.

DOI: 10.1007/s001580050140

Google Scholar

[4] B. Liu, and R. T. Haftka,. A single-level composite wing optimization based on flexural lamination parameters. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 26, 2004, p.111–120.

DOI: 10.1007/s00158-003-0315-6

Google Scholar

[5] J. E. Herencia, and P. M. Weaver, Local optimization of long anisotropic laminated fibre composite panels with T-shape stiffeners. In: Proceedings of 47th AIAA SDM Conference, AIAA, Newport, Rhode Island, (2006).

DOI: 10.2514/6.2006-2171

Google Scholar

[6] J. E. Herencia, and P. M. Weaver, and M. I. Friswell. Initial sizing optimization of anisotropic composite panels with T-shaped stiffeners. Thin-Walled structures, Vol. 46, 2008, pp.399-412.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tws.2007.09.003

Google Scholar

[7] D. B. Adams, L. T. Watson, and Z. Gürdal. Optimization and blending of composite laminates using genetic algorithms with migration. Mechanics of Advanced Materials and Structures, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2003, pp.183-203.

DOI: 10.1080/15376490306741

Google Scholar

[8] S. T. IJsselmuiden, M. M. Abdalla, and Z. Gürdal. Optimization of variable-stiffness panels for maximum buckling load using lamination parameters. AIAA Journal, Vol. 48, No. 1, 2010, pp.134-143.

DOI: 10.2514/1.42490

Google Scholar

[9] H. Fukunaga, and T. W. Chou. On laminated configurations for simultaneous failure. Journal of Composite Materials, Vol. 22, 1988, pp.271-286.

Google Scholar

[10] C. G Diaconu, M. Sato, and H. Sekine. Layup optimization of symmetrically laminated thick plates for fundamental frequencies using lamination parameters. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Vol. 24, No. 4, 2002, p.302–311.

DOI: 10.1007/s00158-002-0241-z

Google Scholar

[11] MSC. Software Corporation. MSC/NASTRAN Linear static analysis, user's guide, (2003).

Google Scholar