The Comprehensive Evaluation of the Human All-Round Development Based on G1- Standard Deviation and Empirical Study

Abstract:

According to the connotation of the Scientific Outlook on Development, this paper constructed the comprehensive Human All-Round Development evaluation index system, determined the optimal weights of indicators by combining G1 method and Standard Deviation method and analyzed the Human All-Round Development of 14 provinces. The contribution characteristics lie on two aspects. Firstly, through the evaluation of the quality of life, quality of human and human capital environment, economic development environment, social development and environment reflect the harmony between humans and nature, humans and the society, humans and humans. Secondly, to evaluate the human All-Round development by determining the weights of indicators in using G1 and Standard Deviation could reflect its own characteristics and indicator data expertise.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 50-51)
• Pages: 823-827
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.50-51.823
• Online since: February 2011
• Authors: Li Bin Zhou, Gang Li, Guo Tai Chi
• Keywords: Comprehensive Evaluation of Human All-Round Development, G1, Index System of Human All-Round Development, Standard Deviation (SD)

References

[1] B. Schmitt. Conceptual Framework and Structure of an European System of Social Indicators[J]. European Reporting Working Paper No. 9. Social Indicators Department, (2000).

[2] United Nations Development Programme(UNDP). Human Development Reports[R]. New York: Oxford University press, 2002: 141-162.

[3] World Bank. Living Standards Measurement Study of the Word Bank[M]. Washington: World Bank press, 1980: 271-305.

[4] L. Peilin, Zhu Qingfang. Task brief introduction：《The evaluation index research of Chinese wll-off society》[N/OL]. Economic information Daily, 2005. 10. 08[2008. 03. 20]. http: /202. 84. 17. 25/www/Article/200510810425-1. shtml.

[5] K. Mazumdar Measuring the Well-being of the Developing Countries: Achievement and Improvement Indices[J]. Social Indicator Research, 1999(47): 1-60.

[6] D. Xinling, Zhao Yanyun. The index system and Comprehensive Evaluation of the well-off society[J] Statistics and Decision, 2007, (12): 61-64.

[7] Z. Shunquan. A Study of Living-Standard Appraisal for Chinese Urban Residents[J]. Journal of Shanxi Finance and Economics University, 2004, 26(3): 35-37.

[8] Y. Wenzhou. The Statistic and evaluation index system of the well-off society[J]. Statistics and Decision, 2005, (7): 28-29.

[9] Y. Pengfei, WANG Lina. The choice of sample data dimension less methods in Financial Early Warning [J]. Friends of Accounting, 2005, (12): 43-44.

[10] W. Kun, Song Haizhou. The compare of three objective weights[J]. Technoeconomics & Management Research, 2003, (3): 18-19.

[11] G. Yajun. The theory and methods of comprehensive evaluation [M]. Beijing, Science Press, 2002. 7-12.

[12] National bureau of statistic of China. China statistical year book. http: /www. stats. gov. cn/tjsj/ndsj/. May 20th, (2010).