Procedure Inversion Effect Analysis of Final System Transformation of Prestressed Concrete Continuous Girder Bridge

Xu Luo; Lu Rong Cai

doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.501-504.1323

Paper Titles

T-Shaped Girder Bridge Detection
p.1305

Influence Analysis of Train Speed on Vibration Responses of Footbridge
p.1310

Analysis on Security Appraisa of the Existing Reinforced Concrete Bridges
p.1314

Reasonable Elevation Calculation of Temporary Pier of Long-Span Steel Trussed Arch Bridges with Semi-Cantilever
p.1318

Procedure Inversion Effect Analysis of Final System Transformation of Prestressed Concrete Continuous Girder Bridge
p.1323

Identification of Elastic Modulus and Effective Pre-Stress Based on Inversion Theory
p.1328

Stone Arch Bridge Disease Detection and Evaluation
p.1332

Optimization of Prestress Reinforcement Design in Large-Span Prestressed Concrete Continuous Rigid Frame Bridges
p.1339

Effectiveness Evaluation on Prestressed Continuous Box Girder Bridge Strengthening with Prestressing
p.1343

HomeApplied Mechanics and MaterialsApplied Mechanics and Materials Vols. 501-504Procedure Inversion Effect Analysis of Final...

Procedure Inversion Effect Analysis of Final System Transformation of Prestressed Concrete Continuous Girder Bridge

Abstract:

When the cantilever construction is adopted by the prestressed concrete continuous girder bridge, the order of two key procedures between removing temporary support and tensing remanent prestressed cable is used to be ignored. In order to study the influence of procedure inversion, the influences on bridge shape, stress distribution and prestressing loss were calculated for one common prestressed continuous concrete box girder bridge by MIDAS CIVIL 2006, respectively. The obtained result presents that: the influence on the bridge shape and the prestressing loss are not apparent, but the influence on the stress distribution is serious; the maximal compressive stress of procedure inversion is more 42.3% than common construction procedure only by tensing the remaining steel beams at box girder; especially, the combining area between the box girder and temporary support is easy to pull out. So, the procedure inversion construction method cant be accepted.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Advances in Civil and Structural Engineering III

View Preview

Info:

Periodical:

Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 501-504)

Pages:

1323-1327

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.501-504.1323

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

January 2014

Authors:

Xu Luo, Lu Rong Cai*

Keywords:

Cantilever Construction, Continuous Beam, Stress Distribution, System Transformation

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Request Permissions

Permissions PLS:

Request Permissions

Сopyright:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

References

[1] Ma Baolin. High pier and long-span continuous rigid frame bridge. Beijing: people's communications press, (2001).

Google Scholar

[2] Lei Junqing. The design and construction of bridges. Beijing: people's communications press, (2000).

Google Scholar

[3] Zhang Jiyao, et al. Cantilever casting Prestressed concrete continuous girder bridge. Beijing: people's communications press, (2000).

Google Scholar

[4] He Xuhui, Qiu Boyong. Investigation of the related issues of the prestressed concrete continuous beam cantilever construction [J]. railway construction technology, 2000, (1): 13-17.

Google Scholar

[5] Liu Liming, Ning Pinghua, Xiong Zhengyuan, et al. The construction control of prestressed concrete continuous beam with 138 m main-span [J]. City Bridges & flood control, 2002, (1): 53-58.

Google Scholar