Comparison Analysis of Typical Buildings in North-South Seismic Belt

Abstract:

In North-south earthquake belt, half of more than Ms 8.0 great earthquakes were centralized since the history records were existed in our country. In order to study the typical buildings in this seismic belt, the seismic damages of the typical buildings occurred during 22 earthquakes in North-south earthquake belt, whose earthquake magnitude were more than Ms 6.0, were organized and analyzed. The seismic damage and its matrix of kinds of buildings belonging to the North-south earthquake belt in different intensities were obtained. The statistic results were obtained by comparison and analysis. According to the results of analysis, the seismic capacity of kinds of typical buildings in this region was provided: reinforced concrete frame structure showed fine seismic capability in all previous earthquake whose seismic damage was the slightest in the real statistics results; secondly were those of masonry and mortised timber frame buildings; the seismic damage of buildings, which was combined with timber frame and soil, stone, brick walls was the most serious.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 501-504)
• Pages: 1639-1643
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.501-504.1639
• Online since: January 2014
• Authors: Jie Ping Liu*, Ning Guo, Ling Xin Zhang
• Keywords: Damage Ratio, North-South Earthquake Belt, Seismic Capability, Seismic Damage

References

[1] YONG You-yu: Sichuan Architecture, Vol. 8, No. 1 (1988), pp.31-34.

[2] GB/T 17742-2008, The Chinese seismic intensity scale.

[3] State Seismological Bureau, National Bureau of Statistics of China: Chinese mainland earthquake disaster loss evaluation compilation (1990-1995) (Seismological Press, Beijing , 1996).

[4] Department of Monitoring and Prediction: China Earthquake Administration Chinese mainland earthquake disaster loss evaluation compilation (1996-2000) (Seismological Press, Beijing, 2001).

[5] Department of Earthquake Disaster Emergency Management, China Earthquake Administration: Chinese mainland earthquake disaster loss evaluation compilation (2001-2005) (Seismological Press, Beijing, 2010).

[6] HAN Juan, YANG Shao-jun, CHENG Xing-qiang: Sichuan Architecture, Vol. 30, No. 2 (2010), pp.106-108.

[7] QIN Song-tao, LI Zhi-min, TAN Ming, HU Wei-hua, HOU Jian-sheng, XIA Yu-sheng: Journal of Catastrophology, Vol. 25, No. 3 (2010), pp.65-70.

[8] SHI Wei-hua, CHEN Kun-hua, LI Shan, LU Yong-kun, ZHOU Guang-quan: Journal of Seismological Research, Vol. 30, No. 4 (2007), pp.379-382.

[9] SHI Wei-hua: Journal of Seismological Research, Vol. 32, Supp. (2009), pp.470-477.

[10] ZHANG Chao, WU Cong-xiao, WU Sheng-xi, HAN Jia-jun, ZHOU Yun: Journal of Disaster Prevention and Mitigation Engineering, Vol. 28, No. 2 (2008), pp.230-235.

[11] State Key Laboratory for Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University: The Wenchuan Earthquake Damage (Tongji University Press, Shanghai, 2008).

DOI: 10.18057/icass2018.p.061

[12] Division of Civil Hydraulic and Architecture Engineering, Chinese Academy of Engineering: Seismic damage investigation of buildings and post-earthquake reconstruction analysis report in the Wenchuan Earthquake, China Architecture & Building Press, Beijing, 2008).