Acceptability Analysis of Parking Charges Based on Structural Equation Model

Abstract:

Parking charges is a widely used and effective means to improve parking demand management. Based on the structural equation theory, the model about the influence factors related to the acceptability of parking charges was established. Eight factors were selected for the modeling, including problem perception, willingness, perceived effectiveness, perceived benefits, perceived freedom, perceived fairness, social norms and accountability. And a survey of two charging schemes was undertaken in Nanjing concerning influence factors of the acceptability. Model verification and path coefficient test were conducted based on the established structural equation model by AMOS. It is indicated that the most significant factors affecting the acceptability of parking charges measure are perceived effectiveness and willingness. Finally, according to the conclusions, the suggestions of improving acceptability of parking charges were presented.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volumes 505-506)
• Pages: 1204-1210
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.505-506.1204
• Online since: January 2014
• Authors: Hui Hui Xiao, Jian Lu*, Qing Ma, Yao Wu, Ye Qian Lin
• Keywords: Acceptability, Parking Charges, Structural Equation Model (SEM)

References

[1] Deakin, Elizabeth et al: Parking Management and Downtown Land Development in Berkeley, California. Transportation Research Record. 2004, 1898: 124-129.

DOI: 10.3141/1898-15

[2] Peng Z, Dueker K J, Strathman J G. Residential Location, Employment Location, and Commuter Responses to Parking Charges. Transportation Research Record. 1996, 1556: 109-118.

DOI: 10.1177/0361198196155600113

[3] Daniel Baldwin Hess. The Effect of Free Parking on Commuter Mode Choice. Evidence From Travel Diary Data. Transportation Research Record. 2001, 35-42.

DOI: 10.3141/1753-05

[4] David A. Hensher, Jenny King. Parking Demand and Responsiveness to Supply Pricing and Location in the Sydney Central Business District. Transportation Research. Part A. 2001, 35: 177-196.

DOI: 10.1016/s0965-8564(99)00054-3

[5] Bollen, K. A. Total, Direct, and Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models. Sociological Methodology. 1987, 17: 37-69.

DOI: 10.2307/271028

[6] Byrne , B. M. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS : Basic Concepts , Applications and Programming. Mahwah , NJ : Erlbaum , (2001).

[7] Surames Piriyawat, Hong Tan Van, Satoshi Fujii. The Roles of Perceived Effectiveness and Problem Awareness in the Acceptability of Road Pricing in Bangkok. Songklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology. 2009, 31(2): 181-188.

[8] Louise Eriksson, Jorgen Garvill, Annika M. Nordlund. Acceptability of Single and Combined Transport Policy Measures: The Importance of Environmental and Policy Specific Beliefs. Transportation Research Part A. 2008, 42: 1117-1128.

DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2008.03.006

[9] Louise Eriksson, Jorgen Garvill, Annika M. Nordlund. Acceptability of Travel Demand Management Measures: The Importance of Problem Awareness, Personal Norm, Freedom, and Fairness. Journal of Environmental Psychology. 2006, 26: 15-26.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.05.003

[10] Anderson, James C. and David W. Gerbing. Structural Modeling in Practice: A Review and Recommended Two-step Approach, Psychological Bulletin. 1988, 103(3), 411-423.

DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411