A Study on the Cognitive Process of Stereopsis in Small Uncrossed Disparity

Article Preview

Abstract:

Static random-dot stereograms (RDS) were used as stimuli to investigate the uncrossed disparity in 15 normal subjects. The response of every subject was recorded with different disparities of 3.27 arc min, 6.54 arc min, 8.18 arc min, 11.45 arc min, 14.72 arc min, 17.99 arc min, 21.26 arc min and 24.53 arc min. The results showed that the human visual system was the most sensitive to stereo images at disparity of 8.18 arc min. Disparity of 21.26 arc min had significant differences with other small disparities in reaction times, as supported the viewpoint that it was reasonable to limit the fine disparity in 20 arc min.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

3655-3658

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Authors:

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Yano S, Emoto M, Mitsuhashi T. Two factors in visual fatigue caused by stereoscopic HDTV images[J]. Displays, 2004, 25(4): 141-150.

DOI: 10.1016/j.displa.2004.09.002

Google Scholar

[2] Parker A J, Cumming B G. Cortical mechanisms of binocular stereoscopic vision[J]. Progress in brain research, 2001, 134: 205-216.

DOI: 10.1016/s0079-6123(01)34015-3

Google Scholar

[3] Richards W. Anomalous stereoscopic depth perception[J]. JOSA, 1971, 61(3): 410-414.

Google Scholar

[4] Poggio G F, Gonzalez F, Krause F. Stereoscopic mechanisms in monkey visual cortex: binocular correlation and disparity selectivity[J]. The Journal of neuroscience, 1988, 8(12): 4531-4550.

DOI: 10.1523/jneurosci.08-12-04531.1988

Google Scholar

[5] Norcia A M, Suiter E E, Tyler C W. Electrophysiological evidence for the existence of coarse and fine disparity mechanisms in human[J]. Vision research, 1985, 25(11): 1603-1611.

DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(85)90130-0

Google Scholar

[6] Yan S M. Digital stereoscopoic Test Charts(Second Edition). People's medical publishing house[M], (1985).

Google Scholar

[7] Hou C, Fang Q X, Zeng L F, Yan M, Shou T D, Li P H. The analysis of static disparity evoke potentials by different disparate stimuli in normal subjects. Chinese Journal of Ocular Fundus Diseases[J], 1995, 11(3): 155-158.

Google Scholar