Fusion Algorithm of Infrared and TV Image Based on Image Quality Evaluation Method

Article Preview

Abstract:

The main method of Infrared and TV image fusion is based on image transform and fusion rule selection. The study implies that the information quantity of Infrared and TV image has significant effect on the result of fusion. This paper proposes one fusion algorithm of infrared and TV image based on image quality evaluation method. The basic idea of the algorithm is that the whole image or the image areas which contains better quantity of information play a leading role in the fusion process. Firstly, algorithm performs the global quality evaluation of infrared image and TV image, and then selects the corresponding fusion strategy according to the quantity of information. The source image has been divided into the high frequency coefficients and low-frequency coefficients using wavelet transform. Second, algorithm selects the rule of coefficients fusion based on the relative image quality of local regions of the image. The algorithm of this paper avoids the interference of low quality image, makes full use of the area of higher information content and achieves the favorable consistency of the fused image. Experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the algorithm.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

570-574

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] L. David, Hall,L. James, linas. An introduction to multisensor data fusion, Proc. of the IEEE 1997, 1, pp: 6-23.

Google Scholar

[2] Y.H. Jia, Fusion of Landsat TM and SAR images based on principal component analysis, Remote Sensing Technology and Application, 1998, 13 (1), pp: 46-49.

Google Scholar

[3] T. Fechner, G. Godlewski, Optimal fusion of TV and infrared images using artificial neural networks. in Proc. of SPIE on Applications and Science of Artificial Neural Networks. Washington, 1995, 1, pp: 919-925.

DOI: 10.1117/12.205203

Google Scholar

[4] S. MASSOUT,Y. SMARA, Comparison of fusion by morphological pyramid and by high pass filtering , Urban Remote Sensing Event, 2009. 1, pp: 1-6.

DOI: 10.1109/urs.2009.5137522

Google Scholar

[5] Y.J. Pei,J. Yu,H.Y. Zhou, G.H. Cai , The Improved Wavelet Transform Based Image Fusion Algorithm and The Quality Assessment, 3rd International Congress on Image and Signal Processing (CISP), 2010, 1, pp: 219 - 223.

DOI: 10.1109/cisp.2010.5646674

Google Scholar

[6] S. X Xing, X. F Lian, T. H Chen, H.B. Xiao, Image Fusion Method Based on NSCT and RobustnessAnalysis, International Conference on Computer Distributed Control and Intelligent Environmental Monitoring, 2011, pp.346-349.

DOI: 10.1109/cdciem.2011.511

Google Scholar

[7] CHEN Zhigang, CHEN Jun. Multi-force image fusion method based on information bottleneck clustering. Computer Engineering and Application, 2010, 46(15), pp: 23-27.

Google Scholar

[8] GE Zhirong, WANG Bin, ZHANG Liming. Remote sensing image fusion based on Bayes linear estimation, SCIENCE IN CHINA PRESS 2007, 4(37), pp: 501-513.

Google Scholar

[9] Hongxun Yao, Min-Yu Huseh, Guilin Yao, and Yazhou Liu. Image Evaluation Factors . ICIAR 2005, LNCS 3656, pp.255-262.

Google Scholar