Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis of Implants with Different Crown-to-Root Ratio and Different High Thread

Abstract:

To compare the strain and stress distribution on jaw bone around the implant with different crown-root and different teeth high in teeth repairing, three-dimensional geometric model of the implant was created and analyzed through UG and finite element analysis software. Model came to workbench software after it was drawn and assembly by 3D mapping software of UG. Given material properties of the model, meshing, boundary conditions and forces applied for analysis. It was Obtained that the size and distribution of stress and strain about jaw bone and implant under different conditions. The influence of jaw bone and implant in different conditions was discussed. The main results of the study are as follows: different implant and crown-root, maximum stress with the crown-root increases, but the maximum stress is placid. Factor in the high thread where the maximum stress with high thread show an inverted "U" shape, the maximum strain with high thread becomes flat.

• Periodical: Applied Mechanics and Materials (Volume 518)
• Pages: 190-195
• DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.518.190
• Online since: February 2014
• Authors: Ying Jie Duan, Ling Chen, Tao Xiong, Xing Hua Niu
• Keywords: Crown-Root Ratio, High Thread, Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis

References

[1] Aramouni P, Zebouni E, Tashkandi E, et al. Fracture resistanceand failure location of zirconium and metallic implant abutments. [J]. Contemp Dent Pract. 2008; 9(7): 41-48.

DOI: 10.5005/jcdp-9-7-41

[2] De Almeida EO, Rocha EP, Freitas AC Jr, et al. Finite element stress analysis of edentulous mandibles with different bone types supporting multiple-implant superstructures. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010; 25(6): 1108-1114.

[3] Jin Ding, Du yang , Qu zhi, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of implants with different crown-to-root ratio for the mandibular first molar [J]. Journal of Clinical Rehabilitative Tissue Engineering Research, 2009, 13( 1)：41-46.

[4] Tada S, Stegaroiu R, Kitamura E, et al. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/ strain distr-I bution in bone around implants: a 3- dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants , 2003, 18: 357~ 368.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jpor.2009.12.004

[5] Himmlova L, Dostalova T, Kacovsky A, et al. Influence of implant length and diameter on stress distribution: A finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent, 2004, 91( 1) : 20~ 25.

[6] Mericske- Stern R, Piotti M, Sirtes G. 3- D in vivo force measurements on mandibular implants supporting overdentures: a comparative study. Clin. Oral Impl. Res, 1996, 7( 4) : 387~ 396.

DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1996.070413.x

[7] Wang kun, Li Dehua, Li Yulong, et al. Contains the formal establishment of the thread type Dental Implant dimensional finite element model[J]. Chinese Journal of Oral Implantology, 2005, 10( 1)：9-25.

[8] JIANG Lu-lu, TANG Jia-qi, LIN Zeng, et al. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the different crown-root ratio of implant-borne prothesis in repairing the first molar of mandibular [J]. Chinese Journal of Practical Stomatology, 2013, 3(3): 144-147.