Microbial Communities in Anaerobic Acidification-Denitrification and Methanogenesis Process for Cassava Stillage Treatment

Article Preview

Abstract:

This study investigated operational performance and microbial communities in the integrated acidification-denitrification bioreactor and the followed methanogenesis process. Industrial wastewater, cassava stillage (CS) was used as the carbon source amended with or without nitrate. The results showed that acidification and denitrification could occur simultaneously in a single acidification-denitrification reactor, and denitrificatoin did not suppress the acidogenic activity. Both denitrification and DNRA could contribute to nitrate reduction and proportions of them were about 60% and 40% respectively at the tested condition of COD/NO3-Nof 50. The introduction of nitrate into acidogenic phase did not have any effect on the followed methanogenic process. Microbial communities sampled from two systems were analyzed by culture-independent techniques based on PCR-DGGE. The relative abundance of acid-producing bacteria (primarily Parabacteroides distasonis and Chloroflexi) in the nitrate-amended reactor further confirmed that the addition of nitrate did not suppress the activity of acid-producing bacteria. Bacteria involved in denitrification and DNRA were also detected. The archaeal communities in methanogenic reactors of two systems showed no significant differences. And Methanoculleus and Methanolobus were the dominant bacteria in the culture.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

573-578

Citation:

Online since:

February 2014

Export:

Price:

Permissions CCC:

Permissions PLS:

Сopyright:

© 2014 Trans Tech Publications Ltd. All Rights Reserved

Share:

Citation:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Rustrian E, Delgenes JP, Bernet N, Moletta R: J Chem Technol Biotechnol Vol. 73(4) (1998), p.421.

Google Scholar

[2] Huang JS, Chou HH, Chen CM, Chiang CM: Chemosphere Vol. 68(2) (2007), p.382.

Google Scholar

[3] Mosquera-Corral A, Sanchez M, Mendez R, Lema JM: Water Res Vol. 35(2) (2001), p.411.

Google Scholar

[4] Tugtas AE, Pavlostathis SG: Biotechnology and Bioengineering Vol. 96(3) (2007), p.444.

Google Scholar

[5] Demirel B, Scherer P: Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol Vol. 7(2) (2008), p.173.

Google Scholar

[6] Shen P, Zhang J, Zhang J, Jiang C, Tang X, Li J, Zhang M, Wu B: Bioresour Technol Vol. 131(2013), p.333.

Google Scholar

[7] Rowan AK, Snape JR, Fearnside D, Barer MR, Curtis TP, Head IM: Fems Microbiology Ecology Vol. 43(2) (2003), p.195.

DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2003.tb01059.x

Google Scholar

[8] Ziganshin AM, Liebetrau J, Proter J, Kleinsteuber S: Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology Vol. 97(11) (2013), p.5161.

Google Scholar

[9] Xie L, Chen JR, Wang R, Zhou Q: J Biosci Bioeng Vol. 113(6) (2012), p.759.

Google Scholar

[10] Muyzer G, Dewaal EC, Uitterlinden AG: Appl Environ Microbiol Vol. 59(3) (1993), p.695.

Google Scholar

[11] Nelson MC, Morrison M, Yu Z: Bioresour Technol Vol. 102(4) (2011), p.3730.

Google Scholar

[12] Philippot L, Germon JC, in: Roles in Genesis and Functions, edited by Varma A, Buscot F, volume 3 of Microorganisms in Soils, Springer Berlin Heidelberg(2005).

Google Scholar

[13] Wallenstein MD, Myrold DD, Firestone M, Voytek M: Ecol Appl, Vol. 16(6) (2006), p.2143.

Google Scholar

[14] Caskey WH, Tiedje JM: J Gen Microbiol Vol. 119(1) (1980), p.217.

Google Scholar

[15] Garcia JL, Patel BKC, Ollivier B: Anaerobe, Vol. 6(4) (2000), p.205.

Google Scholar